Equivalent Resistance in Diamond-Shaped Circuits

  • Thread starter Thread starter qwertyflatty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on finding the equivalent resistance of a diamond-shaped circuit, which resembles a Wheatstone bridge but includes a resistor in the middle. Participants explore various methods for calculating the equivalent resistance, including series-parallel relationships and mesh analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the middle resistor can be omitted in calculating equivalent resistance.
  • Another participant proposes a method for calculating equivalent resistance using series and parallel combinations of resistors, suggesting that the equivalent resistance can be simplified into three parallel chains.
  • Some participants argue that series-parallel relationships cannot be applied to a Wheatstone bridge and suggest using mesh analysis instead.
  • A participant notes that the resistance between specific points in the circuit is relevant for determining the load on the power supply.
  • One participant indicates that a circuit simulator showed no current flowing through the middle resistor, but acknowledges uncertainty about the correctness of this observation.
  • Another participant clarifies that no current would flow through the middle resistor only if the bridge is balanced (R1/R4 = R2/R3), otherwise current would flow when there is a voltage difference.
  • There is a suggestion to think of the circuit as two voltage dividers and to consider the conditions under which no current flows through the middle resistor.
  • One participant mentions using Kirchhoff's laws to set up equations for the circuit, implying a more systematic approach to solving for currents.
  • A suggestion is made to explore wye-delta conversion as a potential method for simplifying the circuit.
  • A participant references an external solution for a similar circuit, directing others to a specific online resource.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of series-parallel relationships in this context, with some advocating for their use while others argue against it. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to find the equivalent resistance, and there is no consensus on the behavior of the middle resistor under different conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the conditions under which the middle resistor may or may not carry current, highlighting the dependence on the balance of the bridge. There are also references to the complexity of the circuit involving multiple resistors and the potential need for systematic analysis.

qwertyflatty
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How would I find the equivalent resistance of a diamond-shaped circuit? Is the middle resistor simply omitted?

By diamond-shaped, I mean it looks like a Wheatstone bridge, but it has a resistor in the middle instead of a current detector.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Say R1 to R5 form the diamond shape, where there are three chain in parallel.

1) R1 in series with R2.
2) R3.
3) R4 in series with R5.

So the equivalent R is very simple...All 3 chain parallel, or if you like, find;

1) (R1+R2)//R3.

2) [(R1+R2)//R3]//(R4+R5).

Simple!

Am I getting it right? You testing us?!
 
I thought you couldn't use series-parallel relationships to solve a Wheatstone bridge, and had to use mesh analysis or something.
 
yungman, the OP might want the resistance between the other two points on the diamond circuit, which would be the resistance that would be the load on the power supply if the diamond circuit was powered like a Wheatstone bridge.


Code:
        A
        |
       /_\
       \ /
        |
        B
 
Last edited:
yungman said:
Say R1 to R5 form the diamond shape, where there are three chain in parallel.

1) R1 in series with R2.
2) R3.
3) R4 in series with R5.

So the equivalent R is very simple...All 3 chain parallel, or if you like, find;

1) (R1+R2)//R3.

2) [(R1+R2)//R3]//(R4+R5).

Simple!

Am I getting it right? You testing us?!

No, your circuit looks like this:

|
/|\
\|/
|

My circuit looks like what the person above just posted.

I created the circuit using a circuit simulator, and it showed that there would be no current flowing through the middle resistor. I have no idea whether or not this is correct.
 
qwertyflatty said:
I created the circuit using a circuit simulator, and it showed that there would be no current flowing through the middle resistor. I have no idea whether or not this is correct.

It's only correct for balanced bridge. If R1/R4 = R2/R3, then no current would flow through the "middle resistor," but otherwise there would be current there (when VAB ≠ 0).

Code:
       A
       |
 R2   /_\  R1
 R3   \ /  R4
       |
       B
 
Last edited:
simplify: think of a bridge as two voltage dividers on same supply

IF they're both set to the same fraction of that supply
THEN they're the same voltage so no difference and no current flows
whether it's a resistor, current or voltage detector between the dividers
 
Last edited:
Hmm, so there's no way to simplify the circuit into one resistor unless R1/R4 = R2/R3?
 
well there's the old standby of write equations from Kirchoff's laws

5 resistors, five unknown currents, five equations

as we said in the 60's - should be plug&chug.
 
  • #10
Try Googling "wye-delta conversion"

You should find all you need.
 
  • #11
The post is asking about circuits like this:

00485.png


The solution for this circuit is given here:

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_10/3.html
It starts about half way down the page.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aaron John Sabu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K