Equivalent Resistance of Figure

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the equivalent resistance in a circuit diagram involving resistors and a direct connection between two points. Participants are exploring the implications of having a wire with zero resistance in parallel with other resistors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to identify the correct formula for calculating equivalent resistance and are questioning the role of a direct cable in the circuit. There are discussions about the behavior of current and the concept of least resistance.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the implications of the circuit configuration, particularly regarding the zero resistance path. There is an ongoing exploration of how this affects the overall equivalent resistance, with various interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about ideal conditions in the circuit, including the behavior of current and the presence of a direct connection that may simplify the resistance calculation.

Yealtas

Homework Statement


https://imgur.com/a/aVCeU

Homework Equations


(1/Req) = (1/Rv1) +(1/Rv2)
Req = Rv1 + Rv2

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure which formula is the correct one to use.So..
I'm absolutely stuck. I tried downloading a bunch of circuit board simulators, but I couldn't find an easy one to use. And googling yields 0 results.

Which formula should I use for the equivalent resistance, and why?

Thank you very much. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a direct cable from one side to the other. What do you expect?
 
I would say electrons choose the path of least resistance, and therefor never even attempt to go through the resistances. But I know that's extremely wrong, so I won't say it. In all honesty man, I have no idea.
 
Yealtas said:
I would say electrons choose the path of least resistance, and therefor never even attempt to go through the resistances.
Correct.

As image:

resistanceisfutile.gif
 

Attachments

  • resistanceisfutile.gif
    resistanceisfutile.gif
    2.3 KB · Views: 820
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
mfb said:
Correct.

As image:

View attachment 213652

Hahaha, I want that as a shirt now to be honest!

Alright, i'll give it a better shot tho:

Let's call the wire "Rv3". Rv3 should have 0 resistance. You'd then calculate the equivalent resistance of Rv1 and Rv3 (With the equation for parallel resistances). Let's call this answer Rv4, so that finally Req = Rv2 + Rv4..?

edit: Rv4 would equal Rv1, so that Req is simply Rv1 + Rv2..?
 
What is Rv4?

There is a cable parallel to R1 and one parallel to R2.
 
I called the cable in the middle Rv3. Rv3 = 0 (so all current can flow freely). Then I call Rv4 the equivalent resistance of Rv1 and Rv3 (1/Rv4) = (1/Rv1) + (1/Rv3).

I just now realize that what I said earlier doesn't make sense. If Rv3 was infinite I could say that (1/Rv4) = (1/Rv1), but Rv3 is 0...

I have a feeling that Req = Rv1 + Rv2, but I can't explain why. And just the plain answer doesn't satisfy me. I need a method :/
 
Yealtas said:
And just the plain answer doesn't satisfy me. I need a method :/
Think about the image in #4.
Although your statement about current taking the path of least resistance is not accurate, your conclusion below is correct (since the wires are assumed to be ideal).
Yealtas said:
and therefor never even attempt to go through the resistances
So what does that tell you about the resistance between the two points?
 
cnh1995 said:
Think about the image in #4.
Although your statement about current taking the path of least resistance is not accurate, your conclusion below is correct (since the wires are assumed to be ideal).

So what does that tell you about the resistance between the two points?

Sorry, I don't quite understand what you mean. Do you mean the resistance of the wire in the middle..?
 
  • #10
Yealtas said:
Sorry, I don't quite understand what you mean. Do you mean the resistance of the wire in the middle..?
How many paths can you find to go from the left terminal to the right terminal? Which of them is the path of "least" resistance? How much is that least resistance?
 
  • #11
Yealtas said:
Hahaha, I want that as a shirt now to be honest!
It exists as shirt in many places.

If you understand the circuit in #4, you can use it to get rid of R1. And then you can use it to get rid of R2. What is left?
 
  • #12
cnh1995 said:
How many paths can you find to go from the left terminal to the right terminal? Which of them is the path of "least" resistance? How much is that least resistance?
cnh1995 said:
How many paths can you find to go from the left terminal to the right terminal? Which of them is the path of "least" resistance? How much is that least resistance?

4 paths. 2 at the start, and then each path has another 2 'sub-paths'. the least resistance is the path through the wire alone.
 
  • #13
Yealtas said:
the least resistance is the path through the wire alone.
Yes, and how much is that resistance?
 
  • #14
mfb said:
It exists as shirt in many places.

If you understand the circuit in #4, you can use it to get rid of R1. And then you can use it to get rid of R2. What is left?
See, i don't understand how i can get rid of Rv1 with #4. I'm still stuck on this problem.

The figure is basically just #4 twice. Any more help please?
 
  • #15
cnh1995 said:
Yes, and how much is that resistance?
Speaking in term of ideal circumstances; 0 Ohm.
 
  • #16
Yealtas said:
Speaking in term of ideal circumstances; 0 Ohm.
Right.
 
  • #17
.
 
  • #18
cnh1995 said:
Right.
Would the equivalent resistance of the Figure simply be 0..?
 
  • #19
Yealtas said:
Would the equivalent resistance of the Figure simply be 0..?
Yes.
 
  • #20
cnh1995 said:
Yes.
Thanks for the help Sheldon.

:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K