Equivalent system (force+couple moment) of a loaded beam

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the equivalent system of a loaded beam subjected to a force of 15 kN and a distributed load peaking at 6 kN/m. Participants clarify that the load function can be expressed as f(x) = (6 kN/m)x from x=0 to x=7.5m, after which it decreases linearly to zero. The process involves integrating the load function over the beam's length to find resultant forces and calculating torques to establish the equivalent couple moment at the pivot point O. The final goal is to shift the resultant force to point O while accounting for the total moment and torque acting on the beam.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beam loading and support reactions
  • Knowledge of distributed load functions in mechanics
  • Familiarity with torque and moment calculations
  • Ability to perform integration of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in beams
  • Learn about calculating resultant forces from distributed loads
  • Explore methods for integrating piecewise functions
  • Investigate the concept of centroids in load distribution
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, structural analysts, and professionals involved in mechanical design and analysis of beams under various loading conditions.

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Homework Statement
Replace the loading by an equivalent force and couple moment acting at point O(drawing attached below)
Relevant Equations
Torque=r x F (vectorial)
load.png
Hi guys,

I don't really know how to cope with this problem, maybe just because I can't properly understand the data.
In the figure we have a beam with its loading(plus a force of 15kN), a pivot O and support at the rightmost point.
I would say that in order to find the equivalent system, I must find the resultant force(by taking the integral of the wing load function over the beam lentgth) on the beam and its point of application, so that I can calculate the torque it produces and add it to the already present 500kNm(so I be able to move the force to point O).
The problem is I don't know how to interpret the function of the beam load. In the drawing it says 6kN/m, but in which way? Does it only apply until x=7.5m, or how would you interpret it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a distributed load that peaks at 6 kN/m at 7.5 m, and decreases linearly to zero at either side of the peak. Do you know how to deal with distributed loads?
 
Chestermiller said:
You have a distributed load that peaks at 6 kN/m at 7.5 m, and decreases linearly to zero at either side of the peak. Do you know how to deal with distributed loads?
uhmm, so it means that from x=0 up to x=7.5m, my "load function" would be ##f(x)=(6k\frac{N}{m})x##, before it starts decreasing linearly
 
greg_rack said:
uhmm, so it means that from x=0 up to x=7.5m, my "load function" would be ##f(x)=(6k\frac{N}{m})x##, before it starts decreasing linearly
If the load density is ##f(x)=(6\frac{kN}{m})x##, what is its value at x=7.5m? You need that to be 6kN/m.
 
greg_rack said:
uhmm, so it means that from x=0 up to x=7.5m, my "load function" would be ##f(x)=(6k\frac{N}{m})x##, before it starts decreasing linearly
The load between x and x +dx in this region would be ##6\times\frac{x}{7.5}dx##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: greg_rack
Chestermiller said:
The load between x and x +dx in this region would be ##6\times\frac{x}{7.5}dx##
And why? Actually I don't think I can deal with distributed loads yet. I interpreted the problem in a different way... tomorrow I'll try to grasp more about this topic and let you know if the problem gets clearer!
 
greg_rack said:
And why? Actually I don't think I can deal with distributed loads yet. I interpreted the problem in a different way... tomorrow I'll try to grasp more about this topic and let you know if the problem gets clearer!
View it as a graph of y against x. At x=0, y=0; at x=7.5(m), y=6(kN/m). What is the equation for y?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: greg_rack and Chestermiller
Alright, I made a few steps backwards and managed to get to an answer(even if probably not by taking the shortest path): I found the ##w(x)## function first from 0 to 7.5m, then from 7.5m to 12m and integrated it along the length of the beam to find the two resultant forces.
Finally I calculated the points on the beam's surface from where pass the lines of action(centroids of the two triangles) of the two forces, to get the two torques in order to find the equivalent couple moment
 
greg_rack said:
Alright, I made a few steps backwards and managed to get to an answer(even if probably not by taking the shortest path): I found the ##w(x)## function first from 0 to 7.5m, then from 7.5m to 12m and integrated it along the length of the beam to find the two resultant forces.
Finally I calculated the points on the beam's surface from where pass the lines of action(centroids of the two triangles) of the two forces, to get the two torques in order to find the equivalent couple moment
Sounds ok. What answers did you get?
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Sounds ok. What answers did you get
Hence I got a total moment and a total resultant force. In order to get to the equivalent system I shifted the force to point O and defined a couple moment equal to the resultant torque acting on the beam(two loadings+given moment+torque caused by the given force)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K