Error calculation for µ in standing wave experiment

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the absolute error of linear mass per unit length (µ) in a standing wave experiment using an oscillating string. The user provided data for different masses and calculated tension and speed, but expressed confusion about how to handle uncertainties and whether to average the values. It was clarified that averaging should only be done for quantities that are supposed to be the same, and the user should estimate the uncertainty in tension (FT) as part of their error propagation analysis. Additionally, the suggestion was made to calculate multiple values of µ from the 15 measurements to check for consistency with the error analysis. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying error propagation principles in experimental physics.
rasalzari
Messages
27
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I experimented with standing waves on an oscillating string, and I was asked to calculate the absolute error of µ (linear mass per unit length). I don't know how to calculate it, so please help me.
I loaded 100g, 200g and 300g on the string. Below are tabulated data of the experiment.

Homework Equations


I know the basics of uncertainties, but in here it's kinda complicated as I don't know how to calculate the tension or speed error. I know this formula:
upload_2018-2-20_16-46-37.png

where c= speed, FT= tension and µ = linear mass per unit length

making µ the subject:

upload_2018-2-20_16-53-11.png


The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So the calculated tension for the 3 sets of masses are:
100g = 9.81*0.1=0.981
200g= 9.81*0.2=1.962
300g= 9.81*0.3=2.943

Speed:
100g= 39 m/s
200g= 54 m/s
300g= 72 m/s

µ values:
100g -> 0.981/39^2 = 644.9*10^-6 kg/m
200g -> 1.962/54^2 = 672*10^-6 kg/m
300g -> 567.7*10^-6 kg/m

Do i like average the tension and speed values and subtract the max and min number

So if i do that then:


average of tension = 1.962
2.943-0.981=1.962 <- this is the uncertainty?

average of c^2:
  • averaging -> 39+54+72/3 =55
  • squaring -> 55^2 = 3025
72-39= 33
72^2-39^2=3663

This seems very wrong i don't really know what I'm doing.



upload_2018-2-20_16-41-56.png

upload_2018-2-20_16-42-20.png

upload_2018-2-20_16-42-30.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-20_16-41-56.png
    upload_2018-2-20_16-41-56.png
    5.5 KB · Views: 1,867
  • upload_2018-2-20_16-42-20.png
    upload_2018-2-20_16-42-20.png
    6.1 KB · Views: 1,673
  • upload_2018-2-20_16-42-30.png
    upload_2018-2-20_16-42-30.png
    4.9 KB · Views: 1,485
  • upload_2018-2-20_16-46-37.png
    upload_2018-2-20_16-46-37.png
    460 bytes · Views: 1,493
  • upload_2018-2-20_16-53-11.png
    upload_2018-2-20_16-53-11.png
    318 bytes · Views: 1,507
  • Like
Likes ephphatha16
Physics news on Phys.org
You absolutely do not average the tensions or the speeds. You average only quantities that are supposed to be the same in order to reduce the uncertainty in the measurements. Since the speed depends on the load, you can average the speeds that you get with the same load for different harmonics. That would make sense. It makes no sense to average speeds for different loads because you know they are different and you know why they are different so what good would it do to you if you average them?

You say you understand the basics of error propagation. You have quoted the uncertainties in f, L and λ. How about the uncertainty in FT? Can you estimate that? If so, find an expression for μ in terms of the experimentally measured quantities and do error propagation analysis. Also note that you have 15 measurements you can use to calculate 15 values of μ separately. Find what these are and see if they are consistent with the error propagation anlysis.
 
  • Like
Likes ephphatha16
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K