Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around methods for establishing the existence and timestamp of a manuscript, particularly in the context of alternatives to posting on arXiv. Participants explore various approaches, including blockchain technology and self-publishing, while considering the implications of these methods.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory, Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants propose using blockchain-based services like stamp.io to create an immutable record of existence for documents.
- Others suggest self-publishing a small e-book on platforms like Amazon as a means to timestamp a manuscript.
- One participant raises a question about the duration for which these methods can reliably establish the existence of a manuscript, suggesting a timeframe of at least a year or two.
- Another participant questions the potential for "forgers" to defeat or work around blockchain-based services, introducing uncertainty about the reliability of such methods.
- A later reply acknowledges the possibility of forgery, indicating that this concern is recognized but not resolved.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the reliability of blockchain services and the potential for forgery, indicating that multiple competing views remain and the discussion is unresolved.
Contextual Notes
The discussion does not clarify the specific limitations of the proposed methods or the assumptions underlying their effectiveness, leaving these aspects unresolved.