Estimate the number of red fishes in the pond

  • Thread starter Thread starter kudesnik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Estimate Pond
kudesnik
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi all!

I have the following problem (in reality I study objects which may be perfectly described by "fishes" as below):

Fishes in the pond: There are N fishes (x of blue color and y of red color) in the pond. N>>10^5, x+y=N, x>>y Each fish has a weight w - positive numerical value. Suppose that the fishing process is a random selection among all the fishes (the probability for catching of blue fish is x/N, for red - y/N).
My tasks:
1) Given minimizing the number of catched fishes estimate the number of red fishes in the pond with predefined accuracy (5-15% would be just ok).
2) Given minimizing the number of catched fishes estimate the total weight of all red fishes.

I would appreciate any reference (I believe it certainly exists since the problem looks like very typical!) to a textbook or a web page in which this or similar problem is considered.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say "Given minimizing the number of catched fishes" do you mean that you are given some specific number of red and blue fish caught? without that information, I don't see how you can do this.

Edited after a little more thought- Clearly if you catch r red fish and b blue fish, with r+b= n, then the percentage of red fish in your catch is r/n. Given that the best estimate of the number of red fish in the entire lake is (r/n)N. You are asking for the smallest n such that you can still be sure that the estimate is within, say 15% of the true value.

Now, that I am clearer on what you are asking, I have to admit that I don't know enough statistics to answer that!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Back
Top