Estimate the partition function by analyzing a graphic

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
All below.
Relevant Equations
All below
1596796127472.png

I am not sure, but since the partition function Z is just the sum of all Boltzmann Factor
1596796184138.png

We can just add:
1596797180297.png

(some terms don't appear in the image, by the way, the estimative is nice, the result is above ANS)

But i didn't understand what the author did:
1596797273294.png


While i didn't even care about the image of the functions (P(s), what he call by height), his resolution is based on it, not only, he talk nothing about the estimative of the exponents (the values on the abscissa), while my resolution is based on it.

What method he used?? Do you understand?
 

Attachments

  • 1596797270517.png
    1596797270517.png
    22.7 KB · Views: 170
Physics news on Phys.org
I was confused at first because the first two terms of your sum are missing. What I see starts at ##+e^{-0.7}##.
The author is doing the same as you, but instead of measuring the x coordinates off the graph and computing each y coordinate, he is measuring the y values directly. This gives him cm rather than the actual Boltzmann factor, but he is only interested in ratios of values since it is going to be normalized to a total of 1 anyway.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K