Estimating Internal Pressure in Sealed Tubes

  • Thread starter Thread starter tuoni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Internal Pressure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on estimating the internal pressure a sealed tube can withstand without failing, particularly in the context of a theoretical experiment involving a Russian 7.62x42 mm cartridge. The conversation highlights that traditional methods for calculating pressure do not account for stress concentrations at the ends of the tube. The definition of "failing" is clarified as the inability to safely contain ejecta, with slight deformation being acceptable. The discussion also touches on the mechanics of a telescoped tube design, emphasizing the importance of structural integrity at the front of the tube during high-pressure scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mechanics and material science principles
  • Familiarity with pressure calculations in cylindrical structures
  • Knowledge of stress concentration factors in engineering
  • Experience with theoretical modeling of gas dynamics in firearms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Cylindrical Pressure Vessel Theory" for foundational calculations
  • Explore "Finite Element Analysis (FEA)" tools for stress testing tube designs
  • Study "Gas Dynamics in Firearms" to understand pressure behavior in cartridges
  • Investigate "Material Properties of Steel" relevant to high-pressure applications
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, firearms enthusiasts, and researchers interested in pressure vessel design and gas dynamics in ammunition systems will benefit from this discussion.

tuoni
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have a quick way of estimating the amount of internal pressure a sealed tube would be able to handle without failing?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
First: How do you define "failing?"

Second: It is easy, but the freshman year easy method does not account for stresses near the ends of the tube, only "far away" from them.

Are you attempting to use very high pressures? I hope not.
 
This is only a theoretical experiment. Too dangerous.

The reason I ask is because I became quite interested when I read about the Russian 7.62x42 mm cartridge a while back. It is a true silent cartridge, the only sound is from the action of the firearm. It utilises a special steel "capsule" that traps the escaping gases and unburned propellant within the casing.

The attached file "pressure.png" depicts a crude simplification of the setup.

The inner tube is able to move forward, providing additional space for the ejecta and propelling the bullet. I just thought this was a very interesting concept, and thought of doing some simple calculations just too see the outcome. At first for a fixed tube, how it would be able to handle various pressures, and then the telescoped variant.

Failing would mean not being able to safely trap the ejecta, slight deformation would be acceptable. The breech and chamber provide support for the rear and sides of the tube, so the critical part would be the front. In the first example, the front o the tube would have to stay intact. In the second example, the projecting tube would have to remain intact, and be held in place by the outer tube. The illustration doesn't include any such system, and I don't really know the exact method used, but let's assume that the tube only moves forward 3/4, the rest of the rear is somehow used to prevent the inner tube from being propelled along with the bullet.
 

Attachments

  • pressure.png
    pressure.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 488

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
862
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
621