Estimating vehicle horsepower and torque

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating vehicle horsepower and torque using various parameters such as air density, rolling resistance, frontal area, drag coefficient, vehicle mass, and drivetrain loss. Participants are exploring the relationships between force, power, and torque in the context of vehicle dynamics, with a focus on calculations involving acceleration and velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the known parameters and seeks an equation to estimate instantaneous engine torque or horsepower at the wheels.
  • Another participant suggests that knowing acceleration, velocity, and mass allows for the determination of net force, drag force, and rolling resistance, leading to the calculation of propulsive force and power at the wheels.
  • A later reply reiterates the previous calculations and questions the units of power at the wheels, suggesting they may be in metric horsepower.
  • One participant shares detailed calculations, including values for force, drag, and torque, but expresses confusion over the resulting torque value, questioning its plausibility given the vehicle's performance.
  • Another participant points out an inconsistency in the use of gravity in the calculations, which affects the rolling resistance force, and provides an alternative calculation for power and torque that aligns more closely with the initial participant's results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the methodology for calculating force and power but express differing views on the accuracy of the results, particularly regarding the torque value derived from the calculations. The discussion remains unresolved as participants continue to refine their calculations and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations related to the assumptions made about the parameters, particularly the treatment of gravity and rolling resistance, which may not accurately reflect real-world conditions. Additionally, the calculations depend on the definitions and values used for various constants and coefficients.

calan
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Given the following instantaneous parameters and constants...

Known:

d = air density = 1.24
Cr = rolling resistance coeffecient = 0.015
FA = frontal area = 1.48
Cd = drag coefficient = 0.29F
G = gravity (mps2) = 9.80665
pi = 3.1415926

m = vehicle mass (Kg) = 1542
DL = drivetrain loss = .2

V = velocity (m/s)
A = acceleration (m/s/s)

Unknown:

F = vehicle force (KgMps2)
T = Torque (KgM)
HP = horsepower

Unknown, but can be found if needed:


Tire radius
Current gear and gear ratio... what would be an equation that would let me estimate instantaneous engine torque (or HP) at the wheels?

So far (I think) I have worked out these terms:

rollDrag = G * Cr * m
airDrag = .5 * Cd * FA * d * V * V
F = (m * A) + airDrag + rollDrag

Assuming that ^ is correct, this is where I'm stuck.

Any help is greatly appreciated. I'm sure I'm just over-thinking it or something, but I've drawn a blank and have been spinning my wheels (so to speak) on this for a couple of days now.

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you know the acceleration, you can determine the net force on the vehicle. Since you know the velocity, you can determine the drag force. Since you know the mass, you can determine the rolling resistance. Eliminating those, you get the propulsive force. The product of that and velocity is the power at the wheels. Knowing the drivetrain loss, you can obtain the engine power.
 
voko said:
Since you know the acceleration, you can determine the net force on the vehicle. Since you know the velocity, you can determine the drag force. Since you know the mass, you can determine the rolling resistance. Eliminating those, you get the propulsive force. The product of that and velocity is the power at the wheels. Knowing the drivetrain loss, you can obtain the engine power.

So would this be correct?

F = (m * A)
airDrag = .5 * Cd * FA * d * V * V
rollDrag = G * Cr * m
Propulsive force = F + airDrag + rollDrag

power at wheel = Propulsive force * V (what would the units be here; metric HP?)
power at engine = power at wheel * DL
 
Last edited:
Yes, that seems correct.
 
Hmmm... I've got some units messed up some where or something. I'm getting numbers that don't make any sense in my excel spreadsheet.
 
Ok... here's the numbers and math:

Code:
d = air density = 1.24
Cr = rolling resistance = 0.015
FA = frontal area = 1.48
Cd = drag coefficient = 0.29

pg = percent grade = 0
G = (m * pg) / SQRT(10000 + (pg * pg)) = 0

V = velocity = 37.8 mph = 16.9 m/s
A = acceleration = 4.1 mph/s * .4470 = 1.8168 m/s/s
m = vehicle mass = 1542 kg
DL = drive train loss = .2
GR = gear ratio = 1.115
TD = tire diameter = .632m 

 
F = (m * A)
F = 1542 kg * 1.8168 m/s/s = 2802 

Fd = .5 * Cd * FA * d * V * V
Fd = .5 * .29 * 1.48 * 1.24 * 16.9 m/s/s * 16.9 m/s/s = 76

Fr = G * Cr * m
Fr = 0

Fp = F + Fd + Fr
Fp = 2802 + 76 + 0 = 2878

T = (Fp * (TD / 2)) / GR 
T = (2878 * (.632 / 2)) / 1.115 = 815.65 N m
T ft lb = T *  .74 =  604 ft lbs

What am I missing? I'm pretty sure the car isn't putting out 604 ft lbs of torque to accelerate at 4.1 mph/s from 38mph. :smile:
 
Last edited:
G used to be acceleration due to gravity, now it is something else and is zero, which gives you zero rolling resistance force. That can't be right.

Apart from this, the power is P = Fp * V = 2878 * 16.9 = 48638.2 W, which is about 65 hp, which does not look unreasonable. The angular speed of the wheels is w = V/R = 2V/TD = 2 * 16.9 / .632 = 53.5 1/s, and the engine speed is wE = GR * w = 1.115 * 53.5 = 59.7 1/s, and the torque T = P/wE = 48638.2 / 59.7 = 814.7 N m, which is close to what you obtain.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K