Euler Lagrange equation of motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the equations of motion using the Euler-Lagrange equation, specifically focusing on the variables r and θ. The context involves the application of Lagrangian mechanics and the manipulation of derivatives related to the Lagrangian function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differentiation of the Lagrangian with respect to time and the implications of the function H being dependent solely on r. There are attempts to clarify the nature of derivatives involved and the relevance of certain expressions to the Euler-Lagrange equations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the differentiation process and questioning the assumptions about the function H. Some guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the Lagrangian and the necessary derivatives, while acknowledging the original poster's attempts and errors in calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring that the function H does not depend explicitly on time, which raises questions about the nature of the derivatives being discussed. Participants emphasize the importance of allowing the original poster to explore the derivatives independently.

bobred
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the equations of motion for both r and \theta of
5E%7B2%7D%20%5Cright%29%5Cdot%7Br%7D%5E%7B2%7D+r%5E%7B2%7D%5Cdot%7B%5Ctheta%7D%20%5Cright%29-mgH.png


Homework Equations


My problem is taking the derivative wrt time of

ex?%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20L%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20%5Cdot%7B%5Ctheta%7D%7D=mr%5E2%5Cdot%7B%5Ctheta%7D.png

and
\dfrac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\dot{r}}=m \dot{r} \left( 1 + \left( \dfrac{\partial H}{\partial r}\right)^2 \right)

The Attempt at a Solution


So
%7B%5Ctheta%7D%7D%20%5Cright%29=2mr%5Cdot%7Br%7D%5Cdot%7B%5Ctheta%7D+mr%5E2%5Cddot%7B%5Ctheta%7D.png

I think this is correct. I have the solution to the second expression but I am unsure how it was found
<br /> m \ddot{r} \left( 1 + \left( \dfrac{\partial H}{\partial r}\right)^2 \right) + 2 m \dot{r}^2 \dfrac{\partial H}{\partial r}\dfrac{\partial^2 H}{\partial r \partial t}<br />
The first part of this expression is fine it is the second part I am unsure of.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please specify what ##H## is a function of.
 
HI, sorry H(r).
 
So if H is only a function of r, the only possible derivative of H is the total derivative wrt r. Since r depends on t, the derivative wrt t is given by the chain rule. This also goes for dH/dr, which is also a function of r. The partial derivative of H wrt t does not make sense if H does not depend explicitly on t.
 
bobred said:
HI, sorry H(r).

So, if we write ##K(r) = (\partial H(r) /\partial r)^2## (which is just some computable function of ##r##) you have
{\cal{L}} = \frac{1}{2} m \left((1+ K(r)) \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta} \right) - mgH(r)
Thus,
{\cal{L}}_r \equiv \partial {\cal{L}} /\partial r = \frac{1}{2}m \left( K&#039;(r) \dot{r}^2 + 2 r \dot{\theta} \right) - m g H&#039;(r)
so
\frac{d}{dt} {\cal{L}}_r = \frac{1}{2} m \left( K&#039;&#039;(r) \dot{r}^3 + K&#039;(r) 2 \dot{r} \ddot{r} + 2 \dot{\theta} \right) - mg H&#039;&#039;(r) \dot{r}

If ##H## does not depend explicitly on ##t## there should be no ##\partial H/\partial t## anywhere.
 
Ray Vickson said:
So, if we write ##K(r) = (\partial H(r) /\partial r)^2## (which is just some computable function of ##r##) you have
{\cal{L}} = \frac{1}{2} m \left((1+ K(r)) \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta} \right) - mgH(r)
Thus,
{\cal{L}}_r \equiv \partial {\cal{L}} /\partial r = \frac{1}{2}m \left( K&#039;(r) \dot{r}^2 + 2 r \dot{\theta} \right) - m g H&#039;(r)
so
\frac{d}{dt} {\cal{L}}_r = \frac{1}{2} m \left( K&#039;&#039;(r) \dot{r}^3 + K&#039;(r) 2 \dot{r} \ddot{r} + 2 \dot{\theta} \right) - mg H&#039;&#039;(r) \dot{r}

This, although correct, is not relevant for the Euler-Lagrange equations which contain what you would call ##d\mathcal L_{\dot r}/dt##. Also, please allow the OP to try to do the derivatives for himself.
 
Orodruin said:
This, although correct, is not relevant for the Euler-Lagrange equations which contain what you would call ##d\mathcal L_{\dot r}/dt##. Also, please allow the OP to try to do the derivatives for himself.

You are right. Anyway, the OP did try to obtain the derivatives for himself, but made some errors. I admit maybe I should have not written so much detail (which does not matter anyway, since I did the wrong calculation!).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K