Evaluate the electric field for two slabs of charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion evaluates the electric field generated by two slabs of charge, one positively charged (Q1) and the other negatively charged (Q2 = -Q1). Four distinct cases for the electric field are analyzed based on the position relative to the slabs: outside both slabs (E = 0), between the slabs (E is strongest), and at the edges of the slabs. The charge density is defined as ρ = Q/V, and the electric field is derived using Gauss's law, resulting in E = ρ/e₀ * h. The conclusion emphasizes that the electric field is strongest between the slabs due to the opposing forces from both charges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with Gauss's law and its applications
  • Knowledge of charge density calculations
  • Basic concepts of symmetry in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's law in different charge configurations
  • Learn about electric field strength calculations in various geometries
  • Explore the concept of charge density in more complex systems
  • Investigate the effects of dielectric materials on electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields and charge interactions in various configurations.

zelscore
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Two slab charges of thickness a with volume charge densities ±ρv are shown in
Fig. 2.30. Assume that the slabs are infinitely extended in the y- and z-directions.
Evaluate the electric field versus x.
Relevant Equations
Fig 2.30: https://imgur.com/a/TOgWvML
Hint: There is no field variation in the y- and z-directions. The electric field has
an x-component. Use Gauss’s law.
Thus I assume that one slab has positive charge Q1
and the other slab has negative charge Q2 = -Q1

There are 4 cases for the electric field:
1. x <= -a
2. -a <= x <= 0
3. 0 <= x <= a
4. a <= x

The general case:

Charge Density ##\rho = \frac {Q} {V}##

Flux of E ##\phi_e = \oint \vec E \cdot d \vec A = \frac {Q} {e_0} = EA ---> E = \frac {\rho} {e_0}*h## where h is the length of the gaussian cylinder used in my case.

For case 2 and 3, h is (x+a) and (-x+a) respectively (thus x ranges from 0 to top or 0 to bottom)For case 1 and 4, the E field must be 0 because there is no charges there (charge density = 0)

This answer is in line with what the textbook says, however, if you test for x = 0 for both cases 2 and 3, you get that h = a (h = a is the highest h can be, thus E is too) which leads me to believe that the E field is the strongest inbetween the slabs, but this does not make sense to me because, spontaneously it feels like the E-field should be the strongest in the middle of the negatively(!) charged slab (reasoning: the +field will try to push a positive charge q placed inbetween the slabs in negative x-direction, and the -field will pull it in negative x-direction too, so the middle of the negative slab seems nice because then the +field has pushed as much as it could in the negative x-direction, while both ends of the -field will pull with equal force, cancelling each other out, so the charge will stay put)Edit: I think I understood it after some more thinking: If you put that charge in the middle of the slabs, the positive field will want to push a lot, while the negative field will want to pull a lot. So it makes sense that the E field is the strongest in the middle.SVARA
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1581951861527.png
 
zelscore said:
For case 1 and 4, the E field must be 0 because there is no charges there (charge density = 0)
This is true here beause of symmetry; just be careful not to assume that an E field is zero just because the enclosed charge is zero. The same E field can enter and leave the gaussian surfaces!

Good work!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
997
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
969
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K