Evaluate the Fourier Transform of a Damped Sinusoidal Wave

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the Fourier Transform of a damped sinusoidal wave defined as g(t)=e^{-t}sin(2\pi f_ct)u(t), where u(t) is the unit step function. Participants explore various approaches to derive the Fourier Transform, addressing both algebraic manipulations and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an attempt at the solution, expressing uncertainty about their algebra and suggesting a need for simplification before integration.
  • Another participant humorously suggests that if one cannot use external resources, they must simply persist with the problem.
  • A new approach is introduced, detailing the integration process and manipulation of the Fourier Transform expression, leading to a derived formula for G(f).
  • A later reply affirms the initial approach and provides a step-by-step integration, ultimately leading to a different expression for G(f) than the one found in the solutions manual.
  • One participant challenges the correctness of the solutions manual's answer, suggesting that their derived expression does not match and implying that the manual might be incorrect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the final expression for G(f). While some agree on the validity of the integration steps, there is disagreement regarding the correctness of the solutions manual's answer compared to the derived results.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the integration limits and the handling of complex variables in the Fourier Transform calculations. The discussion reflects varying levels of confidence in the algebraic manipulations and interpretations of the results.

Captain1024
Messages
44
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Evaluate the Fourier Transform of the damped sinusoidal wave g(t)=e^{-t}sin(2\pi f_ct)u(t) where u(t) is the unit step function.

Homework Equations


\omega =2\pi f
G(f)=\int ^{\infty}_{-\infty} g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt
sin(\omega _ct)=\frac{e^{j\omega _ct}-e^{-j\omega _ct}}{2j}

The Attempt at a Solution


G(f)=\int ^{\infty}_{-\infty}e^{-t}sin(2\pi f_ct)u(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt
sin(2\pi f_ct)=\frac{e^{j2\pi f_ct}-e^{-j2\pi f_ct}}{2j}
G(f)=\frac{1}{2j}\int ^{\infty}_{0}e^{-t}(e^{j2\pi f_ct}-e^{-j2\pi f_ct})e^{-f2\pi ft}dt
G(f)=\frac{1}{2j}\int ^{\infty}_{0}e^{-j2\pi ft-t}(e^{j2\pi f_ct}-e^{-j2\pi f_ct})dt
G(f)=\frac{1}{2j}\int ^{\infty}_{0}e^{-j2\pi ft-t+j2\pi f_ct}-e^{-j2\pi ft-t-j2\pi f_ct}dt
G(f)=\frac{1}{2j}\int ^{\infty}_{0}e^{j2\pi t(f_c-f)-t}-e^{-j2\pi t(f+f_c)-t}dt

I am not feeling confident on my algebra and I also feel like I should be able to simplify this more before I integrate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're not allowed to cheat (e.g. google 'Table of Fourier Transform Pairs', or 'convolution theorem' ) then all you can do is grin and carry on ...
A possible simplification is to put ##{\bf \alpha} = j2\pi (f_c-f)-1## etc.
 
New approach:

sin(\omega _ct)=\frac{e^{j\omega _ct}-e^{-j\omega _ct}}{2j}
u(t) changes limits of integration (just as before): G(f)=\int _0^{\infty}e^{-t}(\frac{e^{j\omega _ct}-e^{-j\omega _ct}}{2j})e^{-j\omega t}dt
Pulling out constants and combining exponentials outside the parentheses: =\frac{1}{2j}\int _0^{\infty}e^{-(j\omega t+t)}(e^{j\omega _ct}-e^{-j\omega _ct})dt
Distributing the integrand: =\frac{1}{2j}[(\int _0^{\infty}e^{t(-j\omega -1+j\omega _c)}dt)-(\int _0^{\infty}e^{-t(j\omega +1+j\omega _c)}dt)]
Integrating: =\frac{1}{2j}([\frac{1}{-j\omega -1+j\omega _c}e^{t(-j\omega -1+j\omega _c)}]_0^{\infty}-[\frac{-1}{j\omega +1+j\omega _c}e^{-t(j\omega +1+j\omega _c)}]_0^{\infty})
=-\frac{1}{2j}(\frac{1}{-j\omega -1+j\omega _c}+\frac{1}{j\omega +1+j\omega_c})
=(\frac{-1}{2j})(\frac{-j\omega +2+j\omega _c}{j(\omega +1+\omega _c)})
=\frac{-j\omega +2+j\omega _c}{2(\omega +1+\omega _c)}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solutions manual gives the following answer: G(f)=\frac{2\pi f_c}{1+4\pi ^2(f-f_c)^2}
Which I believe is equivalent to: G(f)=\frac{\omega _c}{1+\omega ^2-2\omega \omega _c+\omega _c^2}
Any help would be appreciated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jddv
I liked your first post and didn't find errors. Here's my bit. Don't have time to do this step by step, so I'll violate PF rules and work it through:
$$
G(f)=\frac{1}{2j}\int ^{\infty}_{0}e^{j2\pi t(f_c-f)-t}-e^{-j2\pi t(f+f_c)-t}dt$$ was good. In short: your lack of confidence in your own work was unnecessary!
Use $$\int\limits_0^\infty e^{-\alpha x}dx = {1\over \alpha}$$to get $$G(f) ={1\over 2j}\left [{1\over 1-2\pi j(f_c - f) } - {1\over 1 + 2\pi j(f_c + f)}\right ] $$ so $$
G(f) ={1\over 2j}\left [ \left ( 1 + 2\pi j(f_c + f) \right ) - \left ( 1-2\pi j(f_c - f) \right ) \over \left ( 1-2\pi j(f_c - f) \right ) \left ( 1 + 2\pi j(f_c + f) \right ) \right ] $$ and (dividing by ##2j##), the numerator becomes ##2\pi f_c ##, which is good. For the denominator I get $$ (2\pi f_c)^2 + (1+j2\pi f)^2$$ which is not in agreement with your book answer. But it does agree with the cheat link I gave (top page 3).

Your book answer must be wrong: it's a real
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K