Evaluate this surface Integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating a surface integral, with a focus on changing variables and determining integration limits in polar coordinates. The original poster attempts to simplify the integration process by using a variable transformation, while others provide feedback on the limits of integration and the geometric interpretation of the region of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriateness of the integration limits for the variable ρ, questioning the transition from rectangular to polar coordinates. Some suggest that the integration might be simpler in polar coordinates, while others explore the implications of the geometric setup on the limits.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the limits of integration and the geometric relationships involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of limits based on the rectangle's dimensions, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the constraints of the integration limits, particularly how they relate to the geometry of the problem. Participants are also navigating the complexities of changing variables in multidimensional integrals.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



The problem is attached in the picture.

The Attempt at a Solution



The suggested solution went straight into the hardcore integration. I was trying a different approach by changing the variables (x,y) into (u,v) which appear to make the integration much easier...

The Jacobian was found to be J = p

Not sure where I went wrong!
 

Attachments

  • variable1.jpg
    variable1.jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 510
  • variable2.jpg
    variable2.jpg
    38.8 KB · Views: 525
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you get the upper limit for ρ integral? Now you're integrating over a circle, not a rectangle.
 
clamtrox said:
Where did you get the upper limit for ρ integral? Now you're integrating over a circle, not a rectangle.

Hmm if you draw a rectangle with lengths ab, the p ranges from 0 to maximum of √(a2+b2) which is at the corner.

The angle ranges from 0 to ∏/2..
 
You cannot set the [itex]\rho[/itex] and [itex]\theta[/itex] limits independently. The upper limit on [itex]\rho[/itex] will be a rather complicated function of [itex]\theta[/itex].
 
unscientific said:
Hmm if you draw a rectangle with lengths ab, the p ranges from 0 to maximum of √(a2+b2) which is at the corner.

The angle ranges from 0 to ∏/2..

This is true, but if you integrate ρ from 0 to √(a2+b2) for each value of the angle, you are integrating over a circle. Actually the calculation is probably a bit simpler anyway in polar coordinates, so you should definitely work it out. The easiest way is to split the angular integral into two parts: consider first [itex]\tan(\theta) < b/a[/itex]. You should be able to find a simple enough expression for the upper bound of ρ in this region.
 
clamtrox said:
This is true, but if you integrate ρ from 0 to √(a2+b2) for each value of the angle, you are integrating over a circle. Actually the calculation is probably a bit simpler anyway in polar coordinates, so you should definitely work it out. The easiest way is to split the angular integral into two parts: consider first [itex]\tan(\theta) < b/a[/itex]. You should be able to find a simple enough expression for the upper bound of ρ in this region.

Not sure how to do it... I know the limit of ∅ is from 0 to ∏/2 but I don't even know the limits of p..
 
unscientific said:
Not sure how to do it... I know the limit of ∅ is from 0 to ∏/2 but I don't even know the limits of p..

You need to calculate the distance from the rectangle's corner to an arbitrary point on an opposing edge. Can you do that?
 
clamtrox said:
You need to calculate the distance from the rectangle's corner to an arbitrary point on an opposing edge. Can you do that?

If tan ∅ < (b/a) then p = a/cos ∅.

If tan ∅ > (b/a) then p = b/sin ∅.


If tan ∅ = (b/a) then p = √a2+b2
 
Perfect. Those are your integration limits for the radius: now you just need to split the angle integral into
[tex]\int_0^{\pi/2} d\phi = \int_0^{\arctan(b/a)} d\phi + \int_{\arctan(b/a)}^{\pi/2} d\phi[/tex] plug in the radius limits and integrate.
 
  • #10
clamtrox said:
Perfect. Those are your integration limits for the radius: now you just need to split the angle integral into
[tex]\int_0^{\pi/2} d\phi = \int_0^{\arctan(b/a)} d\phi + \int_{\arctan(b/a)}^{\pi/2} d\phi[/tex] plug in the radius limits and integrate.

Nice. But this really looks more complex than doing it the 'hardcore' way..
 
  • #11
unscientific said:
Nice. But this really looks more complex than doing it the 'hardcore' way..

I'm sure it does, if you're not used to changing variables in multidimensional integrals. Did you actually do the calculation? I think you would have found that the integrals you need to compute in spherical coordinates are a lot easier than those in cartesian coordinates. For the first term, you'd get
[tex]\int_0^{\arctan(b/a)} d\phi \int_0^{a/\cos(\phi)} dr \frac{r^2 \cos(\phi)}{r^2} = a \int_0^{\arctan(b/a)} d\phi = a \arctan(b/a)[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K