Changing Variables and the Limits of Integration using the Jacobian

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a double integral involving a transformation of variables using the Jacobian. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the limits of integration after changing from Cartesian coordinates (x, y) to new variables (u, v) defined by the transformations \( u = x^2 - y^2 \) and \( v = 2xy \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of finding the Jacobian and how to correctly determine the new limits of integration after the variable transformation. Questions arise about the necessity of complex functions in the context of the problem and the implications of the transformation on the integration limits.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the limits of integration, with some participants suggesting the need to consider the geometry of the transformation and the behavior of the variables in polar coordinates. The original poster is seeking clarification on the reasoning behind the limits and how they relate to the first quadrant of the xy-plane.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integration region is confined to the first quadrant where both x and y are positive, leading to discussions about how this affects the u and v limits. The original poster has identified an indeterminate form when substituting limits for u, prompting further investigation into the geometric interpretation of the transformation.

agnimusayoti
Messages
239
Reaction score
23
Homework Statement
Evaluate integral
$$I=\int_{0}^{\infty} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac {x^2+y^2}{1+(x^2-y^2)^2} e^{-2xy} dx dy$$
Relevant Equations
##J=\frac {\partial {(x,y)}}{\partial {(u,v)}}##
From the equations, I can find Jacobians:
$$J = \frac {1}{4(x^2 + y^2)} $$
But, I confuse with the limit of integration. How can I change it to u,v variables? Thanks...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
agnimusayoti said:
Homework Statement:: Evaluate integral
$$I=\int_{0}^{\infty} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac {x^2+y^2}{1+(x^2-y^2)^2} e^{-2xy} dx dy$$
Relevant Equations:: ##J=\frac {\partial {(x,y)}}{\partial {(u,v)}}##

From the equations, I can find Jacobians:
$$J = \frac {1}{4(x^2 + y^2)} $$
But, I confuse with the limit of integration. How can I change it to u,v variables? Thanks...
When you calculated the Jacobian, you converted to different variables u and v. What were the conversions you made? Those conversions will determine what the new integration limits will be.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
$$u = x^2 - y^2$$
$$v=2xy$$
 
That one is from the Book
 
I gather you have successfully changed the integral to ##u,~v## variables and are just asking about the limits. Am I correct about that? For doing the limits on this problem, what I have noticed is that ##u_x = v_y## and ##v_x = -u_y## suggesting that ##z = x^2 -y^2 + i(2xy)## is an analytic function, which you may recognize as ##f(z) = z^2 = (x + iy)^2##. Looking at your transformation that way, what does the first quadrant transform to under the transformation ##z^2##? What are the corresponding ##u,~v## limits?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Yeah, that's right. But, wait why that z function (complex function) is necessary? Thanks.
 
This is what I do:
I find:
$$f(u,v) = \frac{1}{4} \frac{e^{-v}}{1+u}$$
 
Then, from
$$ u = x^2 - y^2; v=2xy$$ and for ##x,y = 0## I got ##u=0; v=0##.
$$ u = x^2 - y^2; v=2xy$$ and for ##x,y = \infty## I got u as indeterminate form.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
I think my problem is I can't draw the new axes from given information. I don't know how u, v axes for this case looks like. Maybe I can start from this? Or?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #10
From relation between first variables (x,y) and newer variable (u,v); I find Jacobians: $$ J = \frac {1}{4 (x^2 + y^2)} =\frac {1}{4 \sqrt{u^2 + v^2}}$$
Then, with these variables, the function becomes:
$$f (u,v) = [\frac {(\sqrt{u^2 + v^2})(e^{-v})}{1+ u^2}] |J| = \frac {e^{-v}}{1+u^2}$$
Then, I try the same limit, which are u and v from 0 to infinite. So, I arrived with the answer $$I = \frac {\pi}{8}$$. But, according to Boas final solution, the answer supposed to be pi/4.

What is my wrong? Was it in the limit of integration? Thankss
 
  • #11
Yes. u should run from -∞ to +∞. Do you see why?
 
  • #12
No. I don't see the reason. Because for x and y approach to infinite, i got u an indeterminate form: ##u=\infty - \infty##. Please explain, thanksss
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Try plotting the curves ##u=\text{constant}## and ##v=\text{constant}## in the ##xy##-plane for various constants.
 
  • #14
The integration volume is the upper right quadrant of the xy plane, where x and y are both positive. So restricting u>0 requires that x>y, which is only half of the integration volume. Plotting the uv curves as @vela suggested should help you see this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #15
Here's another way to see the new limits. Think about ##u## and ##v## in polar coordinates. Then ##u = r^2\cos^2\theta - r^2\sin^2\theta = r^2\cos(2\theta)## and ##v = 2r^2\cos\theta \sin\theta = r^2\sin(2\theta)##. Now think about a ray in the first quadrant at angle ##\theta##. Hold ##\theta## constant and let ##r## vary. Do you see that that ray transforms to a ray at angle ##2\theta##? So if ##\theta## goes from ##0## to ##\frac \pi 2## to cover the first quadrant, ##2\theta## goes from ##0## to ##\pi##, which covers the upper half plane. That's why your ##u## variable needs to go from ##-\infty## to ##\infty##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU, Delta2 and vela
  • #16
agnimusayoti said:
No. I don't see the reason. Because for x and y approach to infinite, i got u an indeterminate form: ##u=\infty - \infty##. Please explain, thanksss
In order to get rid of this indeterminate form you got to switch to polar coordinates for x and y, see post #15. Then you got ##u=r^2\cos 2\theta##. ##\theta## varies from ##0## to ##\pi/2##, so ##2\theta## varies from ##0## to ##\pi##, hence ##-1\leq\cos 2\theta\leq 1## and therefore $$-r^2\leq r^2\cos 2\theta=u\leq r^2$$
$$-\infty\leq u\leq +\infty$$
 
  • #17
phyzguy said:
The integration volume is the upper right quadrant of the xy plane, where x and y are both positive. So restricting u>0 requires that x>y, which is only half of the integration volume. Plotting the uv curves as @vela suggested should help you see this.
Here is what I got for the U V axes. Ok, I understand the 1st sentence that the region is in the first quadrant (upper right) of XY plane. But, I can't in u v axes what is equal with first quadrant in XY plane.

However, 2nd explanation implies (for me) that in 1st quadrant, there is 2 option: x > y and x< y but x,y are both positive. To satisfy this, so u must be > 0 and u < 0 (which define the limits : ##-\infty<=u<=\infty##. Is that true?
 

Attachments

  • Hiperbolic variables.png
    Hiperbolic variables.png
    42.6 KB · Views: 260
  • #18
LCKurtz said:
Here's another way to see the new limits. Think about ##u## and ##v## in polar coordinates. Then ##u = r^2\cos^2\theta - r^2\sin^2\theta = r^2\cos(2\theta)## and ##v = 2r^2\cos\theta \sin\theta = r^2\sin(2\theta)##. Now think about a ray in the first quadrant at angle ##\theta##. Hold ##\theta## constant and let ##r## vary. Do you see that that ray transforms to a ray at angle ##2\theta##? So if ##\theta## goes from ##0## to ##\frac \pi 2## to cover the first quadrant, ##2\theta## goes from ##0## to ##\pi##, which covers the upper half plane. That's why your ##u## variable needs to go from ##-\infty## to ##\infty##.
I started to see that if I use polar coordinate, so XY region is from ##\theta_1=0 \rightarrow \theta_2=\frac{\pi}{2}##. Than, if I convert u and v to polar coordinate, the theta now twice from before. So, the region u and v is from 0 to pi. With this in mind, I back to the geometry and see that this region (half XY plane) correspond to u from ##u_1 = -\infty \rightarrow u_2 = \infty## and so does v. Hmm, interesting. So, if the variables used in Jacobian is hyperbolic, I can try polar coordinate to see limit.
 
  • #19
But, I can't see that the ray is transform to ##2\theta##
 
  • #20
agnimusayoti said:
However, 2nd explanation implies (for me) that in 1st quadrant, there is 2 option: x > y and x< y but x,y are both positive. To satisfy this, so u must be > 0 and u < 0 (which define the limits : ##-\infty<=u<=\infty##. Is that true?
Yes, I think you understand now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: agnimusayoti
  • #21
Well, I think I can answer the question by choosing limit for u from ##u_1 = -\infty## to ##u_2 = \infty## and ##v=0## to ##v=\infty##. Limit for v is the same with previous variables because for x,y = 0 I get v = 0 and for x,y approach ##\infty##, v approach ##\infty##.

According previous post, there are 2 methods for define the limit for u since I get indeterminate form while substitute the value for x and y approach infite. I call it geometrically and analytically. With geometric, I have to draw x,y plane and see the region. Than, in the same plane, I have to draw u,v axes and see that in first quadrant, there is one condition that supposed to be satisfied: x,y both positives. That means, x can bigger than y or x is smaller than y. If u varies from 0 to infinite than this limit only a half of original region. So, u is supposed to vary from ##-\infty## to ##\infty##.

Analytically, I have to use polar form to see that first quadrant is corresponded with ##\theta## varies from 0 to ##\pi/2##. Then, I have to change u variable to polar form and see that ##\theta## is transformed to ##2\theta## by this axe. So, in this variable, ##\theta## varies from 0 to ##2(\pi/2)##. This region is corresponded with circle with radius from ##-\infty## to ##\infty##. So, this is the u limit.

For the v limit, I can just take limit ##v=2xy## as x,y approach 0 and infinite. That's it. So, the integral becomes to:
$$I=\frac {1}{4} \int_{v=0}^{\infty} \int_{u=-\infty}^{\infty} \frac {e^{-v}}{1+u^2} du dv = {1/4}(1){\pi}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #22
Thanks a lot member PF.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K