Evaluating a double integral in polar coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on converting a Cartesian double integral into polar coordinates for evaluation. The original integral, $$\int_{-a}^{a}\int_{-\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}^{\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}\,dy\,dx$$, represents the area of a circle with radius \(a\). The correct polar coordinate transformation results in the integral $$\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{a} r\,dr\,d\theta$$, leading to the final evaluated result of \(S = \pi a^2\). The error in the initial approach was using incorrect bounds for \(\theta\), which should span from \(0\) to \(2\pi\) instead of \(0\) to \(\pi\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integrals in calculus
  • Knowledge of polar coordinates and their application in integration
  • Familiarity with the geometric interpretation of integrals
  • Ability to perform variable substitutions in integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of converting Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates in integrals
  • Learn about the geometric significance of double integrals over circular regions
  • Explore examples of evaluating double integrals in polar coordinates
  • Investigate common mistakes in setting bounds for polar integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in integral calculus, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of polar coordinates in integration.

skate_nerd
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I've done this problem and I have a feeling it's incorrect. I've never done a problem like this so I am kind of confused on how else to go about doing it. The goal is to change the cartesian integral
$$\int_{-a}^{a}\int_{-\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}^{\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}\,dy\,dx$$
into an integral in polar coordinates and then evaluate it.
Changing to polar coordinates I got the integral
$$\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{-a}^{a}r\,dr\,d\theta$$
and evaluating this integral I ended up with an integrand of 0 to integrate with respect to \(d\theta\) and I wasn't entirely sure how to integrate that so I thought it might just be \(\pi\).
I really feel like there's no way that answer could be correct, seeing as the integral is of half a circle with radius \(a\) and the answer has nothing to do with \(a\). If someone could let me know where I went wrong that would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: evaluating a double integral in polar coordinates

Since you are integrating over an entire circle of radius |a| centred at (0, 0), that means the angle swept out is actually [math] \displaystyle 2\pi [/math], which means your [math] \displaystyle \theta [/math] bounds are actually 0 to [math]\displaystyle 2\pi [/math].
 
Re: evaluating a double integral in polar coordinates

skatenerd said:
I've done this problem and I have a feeling it's incorrect. I've never done a problem like this so I am kind of confused on how else to go about doing it. The goal is to change the cartesian integral
$$\int_{-a}^{a}\int_{-\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}^{\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}\,dy\,dx$$
into an integral in polar coordinates and then evaluate it.
Changing to polar coordinates I got the integral
$$\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{-a}^{a}r\,dr\,d\theta$$
and evaluating this integral I ended up with an integrand of 0 to integrate with respect to \(d\theta\) and I wasn't entirely sure how to integrate that so I thought it might just be \(\pi\).
I really feel like there's no way that answer could be correct, seeing as the integral is of half a circle with radius \(a\) and the answer has nothing to do with \(a\). If someone could let me know where I went wrong that would be great.

The bounds of the inner integral are 0 and a, not -a and a so that is...

$\displaystyle S= \int_{0}^{2\ \pi} \int_{0}^{a} r\ d r\ d \theta = \pi\ a^{2}$ (1)

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Re: evaluating a double integral in polar coordinates

Thanks guys. I didn't recognize initially that the bounds of the original integral are describing the area of a whole circle. Pretty cool problem now that I get it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K