Evaluating a Finite Sum to a Closed Form Expression

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the finite sum ∑n=1N exp(an + b√(n)) and seeks methods for deriving a closed form expression. A suggestion is made to approach the sum by treating it as an integral, breaking it into two parts. The first part corresponds to the sum of a geometric series, while the second part involves a constant multiplied by the integral of e^(ax^2). This method may provide insights into simplifying the sum. Overall, transforming the sum into an integral can be a useful technique for finding a closed form.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I have a finite sum of the form:

n=1Nexp(an+b√(n))

Is there any trick to evalute this sum to a closed form expression? e.g. like when a finite geometric series is evaluated in closed form.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
I have a finite sum of the form:

n=1Nexp(an+b√(n))

Is there any trick to evalute this sum to a closed form expression? e.g. like when a finite geometric series is evaluated in closed form.
Not here.
You can often get a clue by treating a sum as an integral. In this case you can break it into a difference of two integrals. The first corresponds to ∑n=1Nexp(an), which is simply the sum of a geometric series, but the second becomes constant*∫eax2.dx.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K