Evaluating a Surface Integral for S: How Can the Given Formula be Used?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 2K views
wifi
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
Problem:

Use the fact that [tex]\int_S \vec{v} \cdot d\vec{S}=\int_S \vec{v} \cdot \frac{\nabla f}{\partial f/\partial x} dy\ dz[/tex]

to evaluate the integral for ##S=\{(x,y,z):y=x^2 ; 0 \geq x \geq 2; 0 \geq z \geq 3 \}## and ##\vec{v}=(3z^2, 6, 6xz)##.

Attempt at a Solution:

I'm having trouble setting up this integral. If I knew what ##f## was, I could easily calculate the gradient, as well as the partial wrt to x. I'd still need to figure out the limits of integration though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arildno said:
f(x,y,z) ought to be the scalar function describing the surface S through the relationship:
f(x,y,z)=0

Hmm. I'm not sure you'd get this from the info given. Any hints?
 
Because
1. It fits. Sort of (I admit I haven't seen closely, though).
2. Otherwise, it would be utterly meaningless, since you would have no way to evaluate the second expression due to lack of knowledge of f.
 
More specifically I meant, how would you find ##f## analytically from this info given?
 
wifi said:
More specifically I meant, how would you find ##f## analytically from this info given?

From here:

wifi said:
##S=\{(x,y,z):y=x^2 ; 0 \geq x \geq 2; 0 \geq z \geq 3 \}##

If [itex]y = x^2[/itex] then [itex]y - x^2 = 0[/itex].

(Your inequalities are the wrong way round: you want [itex]0 \leq x \leq 2[/itex] etc.)
 
pasmith said:
From here:



If [itex]y = x^2[/itex] then [itex]y - x^2 = 0[/itex].

(Your inequalities are the wrong way round: you want [itex]0 \leq x \leq 2[/itex] etc.)

So ##f(x,y,z)=y-x^2##?
 
I would parameterize the surface as ##\vec R(x,z)## and use the formula$$
\iint \vec v\cdot d\vec S =\pm \iint_{x,z}\vec v \cdot \vec R_x\times \vec R_z~dxdz$$where the choice of signs depends on the orientation of the surface which, by the way, you need to specify.