Evaluating a Surface Integral for S: How Can the Given Formula be Used?

wifi
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
Problem:

Use the fact that [tex]\int_S \vec{v} \cdot d\vec{S}=\int_S \vec{v} \cdot \frac{\nabla f}{\partial f/\partial x} dy\ dz[/tex]

to evaluate the integral for ##S=\{(x,y,z):y=x^2 ; 0 \geq x \geq 2; 0 \geq z \geq 3 \}## and ##\vec{v}=(3z^2, 6, 6xz)##.

Attempt at a Solution:

I'm having trouble setting up this integral. If I knew what ##f## was, I could easily calculate the gradient, as well as the partial wrt to x. I'd still need to figure out the limits of integration though.
 
on Phys.org
f(x,y,z) ought to be the scalar function describing the surface S through the relationship:
f(x,y,z)=0
 
arildno said:
f(x,y,z) ought to be the scalar function describing the surface S through the relationship:
f(x,y,z)=0

Hmm. I'm not sure you'd get this from the info given. Any hints?
 
Because
1. It fits. Sort of (I admit I haven't seen closely, though).
2. Otherwise, it would be utterly meaningless, since you would have no way to evaluate the second expression due to lack of knowledge of f.
 
More specifically I meant, how would you find ##f## analytically from this info given?
 
wifi said:
More specifically I meant, how would you find ##f## analytically from this info given?

From here:

wifi said:
##S=\{(x,y,z):y=x^2 ; 0 \geq x \geq 2; 0 \geq z \geq 3 \}##

If [itex]y = x^2[/itex] then [itex]y - x^2 = 0[/itex].

(Your inequalities are the wrong way round: you want [itex]0 \leq x \leq 2[/itex] etc.)
 
pasmith said:
From here:



If [itex]y = x^2[/itex] then [itex]y - x^2 = 0[/itex].

(Your inequalities are the wrong way round: you want [itex]0 \leq x \leq 2[/itex] etc.)

So ##f(x,y,z)=y-x^2##?
 
I would parameterize the surface as ##\vec R(x,z)## and use the formula$$
\iint \vec v\cdot d\vec S =\pm \iint_{x,z}\vec v \cdot \vec R_x\times \vec R_z~dxdz$$where the choice of signs depends on the orientation of the surface which, by the way, you need to specify.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K