MHB Evaluating limit by factorization

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the limit $\lim_{x\to5} \frac{x^3 + 3x^2 - 6x + 2}{x^3 + 3x^2 - 3x - 1}$ using factorization. Participants clarify that direct substitution is appropriate since the limit does not yield an indeterminate form. The confusion arises from a discrepancy in the expected answer, with one participant obtaining 9 through substitution. Further investigation reveals that the problem may have been misinterpreted, leading to a different limit evaluation at $x = -5$, which results in -11. Accurate problem interpretation is crucial for obtaining the correct limit value.
Joel Jacon
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me how to solve the following limit by factorization method
$\lim{{x}\to{5}} \frac{x^3 + 3x^2 - 6x + 2}{ x^3 + 3x^2 - 3x - 1}$?Please tell me how to factorize such big equation?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why do you want to factorize it?
The factorization method is useful when the limit is of an indeterminate form like $\frac{0}{0}$ or $\frac{\infty}{\infty}$. But this is not the case thus you can just plug in the value $x=5$.
 
But the answer given in my book is -11. While using direct substitution I get 9. How can you get -11
 
Last edited:
$$\lim_{x\to5}\frac{x^3+3x^2-6x+2}{x^3+3x^2-3x-1}=\frac{172}{184}=\frac{43}{46}$$$$\text{ }$$Are you sure you typed the problem correctly?
 
Yes, the question is correct. See the question 1 in the image
 

Attachments

  • uploadfromtaptalk1418687771929.jpg
    uploadfromtaptalk1418687771929.jpg
    133.2 KB · Views: 98
After saving the image, and rotating it so that it is not upside down, then straining my eyes to read the out of focus image, what I see is:

1.) $$\lim_{x\to5}\frac{2x^2+9x-5}{x+5}$$

Now, you can factor as follows (although it is not necessary):

$$\lim_{x\to5}\frac{(2x-1)(x+5)}{x+5}=\lim_{x\to5}2x-1=2(5)-1=9$$

Apparently what was meant, if an answer of $-11$ was given is:

$$\lim_{x\to-5}\frac{2x^2+9x-5}{x+5}=2(-5)-1=-11$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top