Evaluating the line integral for a specific curve

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the line integral of the function \( x \) along a specific curve defined by the equation \( 9y^2 = 4x^3 \) between the points \( (1, -\frac{2}{3}) \) and \( (1, \frac{2}{3}) \). Participants are exploring various parametrizations and attempting to set up the integral correctly.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different parametrizations for the curve, including \( y = t \) and \( x = \left(\frac{3}{2}t\right)^{2/3} \), and question the validity of these choices due to resulting complex values. Others suggest using \( x = t \) and \( y = \pm\frac{2}{3}t^{3/2} \) and consider splitting the integral into two parts.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of parametrizations and their implications for the integral's evaluation. Some participants express uncertainty about whether the integral could yield zero, while others clarify that the nonnegativity of the integrand suggests a different outcome. Guidance has been offered regarding the need to adjust the limits of integration based on the parametrization direction.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of their chosen parametrizations and the assumptions underlying the line integral setup. There is a recognition that the curve's parameterization affects the integral's evaluation, particularly regarding the direction of traversal.

dumbperson
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


P is the part of the curve 9y²=4x³ between the points (1,-2/3) and (1,2/3).

Evaluate the integral $$\int_P x ds $$


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



$$\int_P x ds = \int_P x |r'(t)| dt $$

My problem is that I cannot find a right parametrization r(t) for this.

I tried y=t, then x=((3/2)t)^(2/3)

but thent goes from -2/3 to 2/3, but that gives a complex x for t=-2/3

Tried it with x=3t² and y=2sqrt(3)t³, I get the same problem.

Any tips ? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dumbperson said:

Homework Statement


P is the part of the curve 9y²=4x³ between the points (1,-2/3) and (1,2/3).

Evaluate the integral $$\int_P x ds $$


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



$$\int_P x ds = \int_P x |r'(t)| dt $$

My problem is that I cannot find a right parametrization r(t) for this.

I tried y=t, then x=((3/2)t)^(2/3)

but thent goes from -2/3 to 2/3, but that gives a complex x for t=-2/3

Tried it with x=3t² and y=2sqrt(3)t³, I get the same problem.

Any tips ? Thanks!

How about x = t and y = ±(2/3)t3/2?
 
Mark44 said:
How about x = t and y = ±(2/3)t3/2?

so split the integral up in 2 parts?

First along the path

$$r(t)=t\hat{x} -\frac{2}{3}t^{\frac{3}{2}}\hat{y} $$ from t=1 to t=0, then

$$r(t)=t\hat{x} + \frac{2}{3}t^{\frac{3}{2}}\hat{y} $$ from t=0 to t=1

$$ |r'(t)| = \sqrt{1+t} $$

So the integral becomes

$$ \int^1_0 t \sqrt{1+t} dt + \int^0_1 t \sqrt{1+t} dt = 0$$

Is this correct? Zero?
 
I would be inclined to use the parametrization, [itex]\displaystyle \ y=t\,,\ \text{ and }\ x=\sqrt[3]{\frac{9t^2}{4}}\ .[/itex]

... but I'm not sure how messy the resulting integral is.
 
Could zero be the answer? It doesn't feel right,but is it possible for a line integral like that to be zero?
 
dumbperson said:
so split the integral up in 2 parts?

First along the path

$$r(t)=t\hat{x} -\frac{2}{3}t^{\frac{3}{2}}\hat{y} $$ from t=1 to t=0, then

$$r(t)=t\hat{x} + \frac{2}{3}t^{\frac{3}{2}}\hat{y} $$ from t=0 to t=1

$$ |r'(t)| = \sqrt{1+t} $$

So the integral becomes

$$ \int^1_0 t \sqrt{1+t} dt + \int^0_1 t \sqrt{1+t} dt = 0$$

Is this correct? Zero?

dumbperson said:
Could zero be the answer? It doesn't feel right,but is it possible for a line integral like that to be zero?

Yes, in general it is possible for ds line integrals to come out to zero. But not in this case. Your integrand is nonnegative and ##ds## is always positive. The problem is that when you use the formula ##ds =|\vec r'(t)|dt## you are assuming the curve is parameterized in the positive direction. Since that is not the case in your second integral, it needs a negative sign in front or, what is the same thing, the limits reversed.
 
LCKurtz said:
Yes, in general it is possible for ds line integrals to come out to zero. But not in this case. Your integrand is nonnegative and ##ds## is always positive. The problem is that when you use the formula ##ds =|\vec r'(t)|dt## you are assuming the curve is parameterized in the positive direction. Since that is not the case in your second integral, it needs a negative sign in front or, what is the same thing, the limits reversed.

Ahh, thanks.

So the integral becomes

$$2\int^1_0 t\sqrt{1+t} dt $$

u= 1+t, du= dt, t=u-1

$$2\int^{u(1)}_{u(0)} (u^{\frac{3}{2}}-u^{\frac{1}{2}}) du = [\frac{4}{5}u^{\frac{5}{2}}-\frac{4}{3}u^{\frac{3}{2}}]^{{2}}_{1} = $$

Is this alright then?
 
dumbperson said:
Ahh, thanks.

So the integral becomes

$$2\int^1_0 t\sqrt{1+t} dt $$

u= 1+t, du= dt, t=u-1

$$2\int^{u(1)}_{u(0)} (u^{\frac{3}{2}}-u^{\frac{1}{2}}) du = [\frac{4}{5}u^{\frac{5}{2}}-\frac{4}{3}u^{\frac{3}{2}}]^{{2}}_{1} = $$

Is this alright then?

Yes, except the final simplified answer seems to be missing...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K