I Evaluating the quark neutrino mixing matrix

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the CKM and PMNS matrices that describe the mixing of quarks and neutrinos, respectively, emphasizing their complex trigonometric components. Participants seek clarification on how the complex terms, such as e^{iσ_{13}}, translate into real values in the final numerical matrices, which are derived from experimental data. There is confusion regarding the variability of e^{-iσ_{13}} across different matrix elements, as it appears to change rather than maintain a fixed value. The conversation also touches on the precision of neutrino flavor oscillations, which are modeled as sinusoidal functions of distance. Overall, the intricacies of the mixing matrices and their implications for particle physics are central to the discussion.
James1238765
Messages
120
Reaction score
8
TL;DR
How to resolve the complex trigonometric exponential ##\exp{i\sigma{cp}}## in the CKM and PMNS matrix parameters?
The mixing of the 3 generations of fermions are tabulated into the CKM matrix for quarks:

$$ \begin{bmatrix}
c_{12}c_{13} & s_{12}c_{13} & s_{13}e^{-i\sigma_{13}} \\
-s_{12}c_{23}-c_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\sigma_{12}} & c_{12}c_{23}-s_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\sigma_{13}} & s_{23}c_{13} \\
s_{12}s_{23}-c_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\sigma_{13}} & -c_{12}s_{23}-s_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\sigma_{13}} & c_{23}c_{13}
\end{bmatrix} $$

where c12 is shorthand for the ##cos(\sigma_{12})## function, and s is shorthand for the ##sin(\sigma_{12})## function, and with experimentally fitted values as follows:

$$ \begin{bmatrix}
0.97370 & 0.2245 & 0.00382 \\
0.221 & 0.987 & 0.041 \\
0.008 & 0.0388 & 1.013
\end{bmatrix} $$

Similarly the PMNS matrix tabulates the mixing statistics for neutrinos:

$$ \begin{bmatrix}
c_{12}c_{13} & s_{12}c_{13} & s_{13}e^{-i\sigma_{cp}} \\
-s_{12}c_{23}-c_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\sigma_{cp}} & c_{12}c_{23}-s_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\sigma_{cp}} & s_{23}c_{13} \\
s_{12}s_{23}-c_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\sigma_{cp}} & -c_{12}s_{23}-s_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\sigma_{cp}} & c_{23}c_{13}
\end{bmatrix} $$

with experimentally fitted values as follows:

$$ \begin{bmatrix}
0.801 & 0.513 & 0.143 \\
0.232 & 0.459 & 0.629 \\
0.260 & 0.470 & 0.609
\end{bmatrix} $$

Could anyone explain how the complex trigonometric ##e^{i\sigma_{13}}## and ##e^{i\sigma_{cp}}## having the form

$$e^{i\sigma_{13}} = \cos \sigma_{13} + i \sin \sigma_{13} $$

can morph into real values in the final numerical matrices, please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
@vanhees71 thank you. Very oddly the ##e^{-i\sigma_{13}}## has no constant fixed value throughout.

##\sigma_{13}## is a fixed numerical angle at 68.8 degrees, but even if we set ##e^{-i\sigma_{13}}## to a particular value to correctly match a particular matrix element, the other matrix elements having ##e^{-i\sigma_{13}}## term will still output wrong answers.

So ##e^{-i\sigma_{13}}## changes for every matrix element calculation. It seems never defined what ##e^{-i\sigma_{13}}## means in the above paper, and other papers like [this] , so I guess I will just leave it there for now.
 
Neutrino flavor oscillations are clock-like precise as a function of distance. For two-neutrinos oscillation:

$$Prob_{switch} = \sin^2{(2\theta})\sin^2{(\frac{\triangle m^2L}{4E})}$$

which is sinusoidal with respect to distance traveled L.

320px-Oscillations_muon_short.svg.png

(source: wiki)
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K