Hi everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have read a few different ways of looking at this problem, and it's one of those things where I am happywith the answer, just not how to get there using proper mathematics. My lecturer described this with some complex integrals involving E (but I'm not sure what that is!) but I have found a simpler treatment in a textbook, which revolves around this idea:

Looking at the Schwarzschild metric (in natural units with c = 1), we can get to

dt/dr = (1 - 2GM/r)

so t is the integral of (1 - 2GM/r) from infinity (distant starting point) to 2GM (the event horizon or Schwarzschild radius).

I know the answer is infinity as to a distant observer a falling object never reaches the event horizon, and I understand the physics of why that happens. I am not sure how to properly evaluate this integral to prove it though. My calculus is pretty poor, so I always try and break these things down as much as possible. I got

t = ∫(1 - 3GM/r) dr

t = ∫1 - ∫(2GM/r) dr

t = ∫1 - 2GM∫(1/r) dr

t = [r] - 2GM[ln r]

So when r = 2GM I get

t1 = 2GM - 2GM ln 2GM or just t = x - x ln x

and when r = infinity

t2 = ∞ - 2GM ln ∞

and infall time t = t2 - t1

That all looks like total rubbish to me, and certainly doesn't look like a clear answer that dt = ∞ which is what I'd like to get to. Is there a better way to approach this or have I made a stupid mistake/drastic oversimplification somewhere?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Evaluating time for falling body to reach event horizon

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**