Evaluation of Strike and the 3 point problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter succubus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the 3-point problem and the application of Cramer’s Rule in evaluating strike. The key confusion arises from the need to plot the slope with x as a function of y when using arctan for the slope in the horizontal xy plane. A reference paper is provided for further clarification, specifically pointing to equation 26. The original poster, Pati, later indicates that they resolved their confusion after some reflection. This highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between variables in mathematical evaluations.
succubus
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Evaluation of Strike and the 3 point problem...

If anyone in ehre is familiar with the 3-point problem and Cramers Rule, I need some help.

In the evaluation of strike, you are supposed to take the equation for the plane in the horizontal xy plane. But when you arctan the slope, you are supposed to use the slope with x plotted as a functin of y. I don't quite understand this concept. If you need a better explanation you can read about it in this paper written by my teacher.

http://www.nagt.org/files/nagt/jge/c...-v48n4p522.pdf

Its equation 26.

Any help would be appreciated.

-Pati
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Nevermind, after thinking about it for about 10 minutes I got it :( ROFL 1 year later MUHAHAHAHAHA :o
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top