Every interior point of 'the closure of S' is in Int S?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a set S in R^n, specifically examining whether every interior point of the closure of S is also an interior point of S. Participants are exploring the implications of the definitions of interior points and closures in the context of topology.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants are questioning the relationship between the interior of S and the interior of its closure, considering scenarios where the interior of S may be empty while the interior of the closure is not. Others are seeking clarification on how these conditions can coexist.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about specific cases and seeking further explanation of the concepts involved. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the dialogue is exploring various interpretations of the definitions and their implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the possibility of S being "thin" or "infinitely full of holes," which may affect the existence of interior points. This introduces complexity in understanding the relationship between S and its closure.

pantin
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let S be a set in R^n, is it true that every interior point of 'the closure of S' is in Int S? Justify.

2. Relevant theorem

S^int = {x belongs to S: B(r,x) belongs to S for some r>0}
The closure of S is the union of S and all its bdary points.



The Attempt at a Solution



My answer is yes, but I am not sure how to give a proof, anyone can give a counterexample?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can happen that [tex]\textrm{int}(S)=\emptyset[/tex] while on the other hand [tex]\textrm{int}(\overline{S})\neq\emptyset[/tex].
 
jostpuur said:
It can happen that [tex]\textrm{int}(S)=\emptyset[/tex] while on the other hand [tex]\textrm{int}(\overline{S})\neq\emptyset[/tex].


hi jostpuur, thanks for your reply, but when the first case happens, how can the second one happens like that?
I don't quite get it, can you explain it a little bit more?
 
If S doesn't have interior, it doesn't necessarily mean that S is somehow "thin" (like n-k dimensional manifold in n dimensional space, with k > 0), but S can also be "filling" all n dimensions in the space, but on the other hand being "infinitely full of holes" so that interior doesn't exist.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K