franznietzsche
- 1,503
- 6
0TheSwerve0 said:Yes, I am offering an alternate explanation because I think that you offer an inadequate one.
Probably because I didn't intend to offer any explanation. I don't pretend to be able to explain things I'm not qualified to comment on. I do want to be very clear though, that if you can't demonstrate competency, then you shouldn't get the diploma, period. Regardless of if it was fair. The fairness of the education system is a separate issue.
Again, I didn't say this was the only issue. I made no comment as to whether or not these students should get diplomas. I'm trying to show that that question ignores the reason why (the main issue I think) the students aren't qualified to get them. I thought you were being completely unfair, but I guess I did derail the thread. Seems logical comments should be saved for other forums...
The why is a separate issue. I recognize that, and I'm intentionally not directly addressing it, as it was not the issue of this thread. The issue was whether or not someone who cannot demonstrate the competency that the diploma is meant to recognize should be given one anyway. I claim they should not, otherwise the diploma is a meaningless piece of paper.