Expansion Joint Connection to storage tank

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the placement of an expansion joint in a piping system connected to a crude oil tank. It highlights the importance of the expansion joint's location relative to a valve, as its pressure requirements differ based on whether it is positioned before or after the valve. Questions arise regarding the design pressure of the piping system being significantly higher than the static pressure in the tank, prompting inquiries about the presence of a pump and the support structure of the piping. Participants request sketches of the existing and proposed systems for clarity. The conversation emphasizes the need for detailed information to assess the practicality of connecting the expansion joint directly to the tank's nozzle.
Amir Sedieqy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,
In a piping system connected to the outlet of an crude oil tank, process man has located the expansion joint after the valve which is connected to tank's nozzle. Since this expansion joint is located after the valve, it must be able to withstand the design pressure of the piping system. However, if this expansion valve were located before the valve, and was connected to the tank's nozzle, it should have only withstand the pressure due to fluid height in the tank, which is one-twentieth of the piping design pressure. I was wondering whether it is practical to connect the expansion joint directly to the tank's nozzle. I appreciate it if could share your similar experience.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your description is unclear. Why is the design pressure of the piping system 20 times higher than the static pressure in the tank when the piping is connected to the outlet of the tank? Is there a pump in there somewhere? Where are the nearest anchor points in the piping system? How is the piping supported near the expansion joint? What is the tank's nozzle, or are you referring to the tank outlet connection?

We need a sketch of the existing system, and a second sketch showing your proposed system.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top