Expansion of the Universe, Dark Energy and Conservation of energy.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the relationship between the expansion of the universe, dark energy, and the conservation of energy. It highlights that, from a General Relativity (GR) perspective, there is no global conservation of energy due to the time-dependent Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric, with only local conservation enforced by the equation \nabla_{\mu}T^{\mu\nu}=0. In contrast, the Newtonian view suggests that as the universe expands, dark energy increases, but the negative pressure of dark energy results in a cancellation of energy, maintaining conservation. The conversation also touches on the complexities of tensor equations and the need for further clarification on these concepts. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the nuanced understanding of energy conservation in the context of cosmic expansion.
xdrgnh
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
Doesn't the expansion of the universe defy conservation of energy, as the universe expands more dark energy is being created. That means the total energy in the universe isn't stable and is increasing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GR point of view: There is no global conservation in the universe, because the FRW metric is time dependent. In GR there is only local energy conservation enforced by \nabla_{\mu}T^{\mu\nu}=0, and adding a term to the stress tensor of the form \Lambda\,g_{\mu\nu} doesn't change that.

Newtonian point of view: As the universe gets bigger, there is more energy from dark energy. However, as the universe gets bigger, PdV work is done on it by sources of pressure. Since dark energy has a negative pressure, this work is negative, and so the two energies exactly cancel out to conserve energy.
 
nicksauce said:
GR point of view: There is no global conservation in the universe, because the FRW metric is time dependent. In GR there is only local energy conservation enforced by \nabla_{\mu}T^{\mu\nu}=0, and adding a term to the stress tensor of the form \Lambda\,g_{\mu\nu} doesn't change that.

Newtonian point of view: As the universe gets bigger, there is more energy from dark energy. However, as the universe gets bigger, PdV work is done on it by sources of pressure. Since dark energy has a negative pressure, this work is negative, and so the two energies exactly cancel out to conserve energy.

Thanks for clarifying that up for me, I really appreciate it. I'm interesting that tensor equation you showed me. I'm not really familiar with tensors, I do know partial derivatives though can you explain that equation more throughly for me.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top