Expectation values and the Harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating expectation values for a quantum harmonic oscillator using the state |ψ> = (|0> + |1>) / √(2). The key calculations involve finding <ψ|x|ψ>, <ψ|p|ψ>, <ψ|x²|ψ>, and <ψ|p²|ψ>, with the final results yielding = 0 and

= 0. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding the action of raising and lowering operators (a+ and a-) on the states and the orthogonality of the basis states in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals, particularly the harmonic oscillator model.
  • Understanding of bra-ket notation and operator algebra.
  • Familiarity with raising and lowering operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic knowledge of expectation values and their calculations in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of expectation values in quantum mechanics using various states.
  • Learn about the properties of raising and lowering operators in quantum harmonic oscillators.
  • Explore the implications of orthogonality in quantum state calculations.
  • Investigate the significance of non-self-adjoint operators in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, particularly those tackling problems related to harmonic oscillators, and educators looking for examples of expectation value calculations.

Diomarte
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the Harmonic Oscillator, the state |ψ> = (|0> + |1>) / √(2)

Find \overline{x} = <ψ|x|ψ> \overline{p} = <ψ|p|ψ>
\overline{x^2} = <ψ|x^{2}|ψ> and \overline{p^2} = <ψ|p^{2}|ψ>

and

<ψ| (x - \overline{x})^2 |ψ><ψ| (p - \overline{p})^2 |ψ>

2. Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I got some help from another student on getting started with the first part of this problem, but in all honesty I'm really not even sure how to start some of these, and how the operators work. This is what I've got so far:

<ψ|x|ψ> = <ψ|√(hbar/2mω) (a+a_)|ψ>
<ψ| = 1/√2 (<0| + <1|)
|ψ> = 1/√2 (|0> + |1>)

giving 1/2 √(hbar/2mω) (<0| + <1|) (a+a_) (|0> + |1>)


from here the raising and lowering operators are operating on the nth states of 0 and 1. I know that a_|0> = 0 and a_|n> = √(n)|n-1> and that a+|n> = √(n+1)|n+1> but if anyone can make a suggestion or show me how to get some results here, I would greatly appreciate it. As well, some direction on how to start the next parts would be amazing too, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you essentially got this expression (<0| + <1|) (a_+ + a_) (|0> + |1>). Ok, there's some operator 'sandwiched' between bra's and ket's. Can you expand this expression into a sum of 4 terms and then compute each term separately ?
 
dextercioby said:
So you essentially got this expression (<0| + <1|) (a_+ + a_) (|0> + |1>). Ok, there's some operator 'sandwiched' between bra's and ket's. Can you expand this expression into a sum of 4 terms and then compute each term separately ?

Meaning have the a+ operator act on the bras and then the a_ operate on the kets?
 
Just have them act on the ket, though it doesn't make a difference.
 
"Though it doesn't make a difference." Why do you say this vela? Is it because of the orthogonality and cancellation if you end up multiplying through after the operations?
 
Because if you do the calculations correctly, it doesn't matter whether you have the operators act on the bra or the ket. Why do you think it does?
 
Actually, there's a trick to take into account. The raising & the lowering ladder operators are not self-adjoint, but one is the adjoint of the other, so that

\langle 0|a_{+}|0 \rangle = \langle a_{-}0, 0\rangle = \langle 0,a_{+} 0\rangle.
 
Alright, so I performed the operations and got <x> = 0 and <p> = 0. Two other students I spoke with said that they got <p> = 0 but not <x>. Am I making another mistake here?
 
Ok, never mind, I figured out what was going on. Thank you all very much for your help. After following what was going on, I've successfully solved four of my five assignments! I'll post what I did later on tonight when I've got the time, so if other people have a similar question, they have a direction to go.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K