Expected number of blue balls drawn from a sack of m red balls and n blue balls?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Somefantastik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
Somefantastik
Messages
226
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me break this down?

\Sigma^{k}_{i=1}\frac{i \left(^{n}_{i}\right)\left(^{m}_{k-i}\right)}{\left(^{m+n}_{k}\right)}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
k*n/(m+n)
 
Thanks for your help, but I had the answer and was really looking for the process.
 
Look at the expectation of a Hypergeometric variable.
 
Somefantastik said:
Can someone help me break this down?

\Sigma^{k}_{i=1}\frac{i \left(^{n}_{i}\right)\left(^{m}_{k-i}\right)}{\left(^{m+n}_{k}\right)}


First translate from math to English: there are m red balls and n blue balls in a sack from which you randomly draw k balls. What is the expected number of blue balls drawn? Now translate back into math: try using indicator random variables X_{j} which equal 1 if the j-th drawn ball is blue and 0 if it is red. Now define the random variable

<br /> X = \sum_{j=1}^{k} X_{j}<br />

and compute the expected value of that and hopefully you'll get the answer that Roberto gave.


addendum: doh! After all that I just realized you can factor the answer out of the sum. Then use the illustration of selecting balls to see what the resulting sum must be.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top