Expecting the possible event of zero probability

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of zero probability in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of a one-dimensional potential well. It highlights that while the probability of finding a particle at a specific point is mathematically zero, this does not imply that such an event is impossible; rather, it can still be considered a possible event. The expectation value of the position operator indicates that the particle is most likely to be found at the midpoint of the well, despite the wave function being zero at that point. The conversation also touches on the implications of the uncertainty principle, suggesting that localizing a particle at a single point leads to infinite momentum, yet does not exclude the particle from the potential well. Overall, the thread emphasizes the nuanced relationship between probability, expectation, and physical interpretation in quantum mechanics.
victorvmotti
Messages
152
Reaction score
5
Consider a potential well in 1 dimension defined by
$$
V(x)=
\begin{cases}
+\infty &\text{if}& x<0 \text{ and } x>L\\
0 &\text{if} &0\leq x\leq L
\end{cases}
$$

The probability to find the particle at any particular point x is zero.

$$P(\{x\}) = \int_S \rho(x)\mathrm{d}x=0 ;\forall\; x \in \mathbb{R}$$.

$$S = \{x\}$$ is a null set w.r.t. to the usual integration measure and therefore for each point the assigned probability is zero.

Let's suppose that the energy level is $$E_2$$ so the wavefunction is given by $$\psi_2(x)=(\frac {2}{L})^{\frac {1}{2}} \sin(\frac {2 \pi x}{L})=\psi_{2}^*(x)$$.

Now calculate the "expectation value" of position operator $$\hat{x}$$

$$<x>_2=<E_2|\hat{x}|E_2>=\frac{2}{L}\int_0^L\psi_{2}^*(x)x\psi_2(x)dx$$

So $$<x>_2=\frac{2}{L}\int_0^L x\sin^2(\frac {2 \pi x}{L})dx=\frac {L}{2}$$

Now you say that you "will observe, on average, the particle" at $$x=\frac {L}{2}$$

Can we say that here we indeed "expect" to measure or observe this "possible" event which has "zero" probability, i.e. occurs "almost never"?

Can we say that, respecting the uncertainty principle, if you localize the particle at any particular point, that is with zero uncertainty, then its momentum tends to infinity and thus will not be in this potential well.

Do we need to redefine our common meaning for the words, expectation, possible, and probable?

Also we see that $$\psi_2(\frac {L}{2})=0 \to |\psi_2(\frac {L}{2})|^2=0$$

But what is or how we should interpret the value of $$|\psi_2(\frac {L}{2})|^2$$

Is $$x=L/2$$ any different from other points given this particular wave function?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You based what you said on a wrong assumption. Its not that the probability for observing the particle is zero for all x. Its only zero for the places where the potential is infinite. For the zero potential region, you should find the wave function and that will give you the probability at each point.
 
\rho is a probability density and must be integrated over some subset of \mathbb R to actually gain a probability.

But $$S = \{x\}$$ is a null set w.r.t. to the usual integration measure and therefore for each point the assigned probability is zero.
 
I understand it now. But that's not how things work in QM. It just doesn't make sense physically to integrate from x to x and get zero and conclude that its impossible for the particle to be at x! I mean, it wasn't in the mind of the people who were developing QM so they didn't mean to get something from this so I think you can't get something out of it too.
Also, all things you did are mathematical. Mathematical tricks can't produce physical phenomena!
 
I didn't conclude that it is impossible to find the particle in a particular, neither mathematically nor physically. However, said, by math, that it should be assigned zero probability. That is precisely the point here, impossible here does not relate or is equivalent to improbable. In QM formalism, an event could be improbable, that is to occur almost never, yet it is a possible event. Ordinary language is, of course, not helpful here.
 
victorvmotti said:
Can we say that here we indeed "expect" to measure or observe this "possible" event which has "zero" probability, i.e. occurs "almost never"?

Yes, events with zero probability are possible events. Zero probability never implies the event is impossible. The deduction is correct only in the opposite direction; impossible event necessarily has zero probability (or is not even considered to have probability). This has nothing to do with wave functions - it is probability theory.

victorvmotti said:
Can we say that, respecting the uncertainty principle, if you localize the particle at any particular point, that is with zero uncertainty, then its momentum tends to infinity and thus will not be in this potential well.
You can say it, but a lot of people will not agree. High momentum does not mean the particle is outside potential well. For the infinite potential well, it is possible to have positive probability for any finite interval of momenta.

victorvmotti said:
Do we need to redefine our common meaning for the words, expectation, possible, and probable?
No, I do not think so.
victorvmotti said:
But what is or how we should interpret the value of $$|\psi_2(\frac {L}{2})|^2$$
Density of probability of position at ##x=L/2## corresponding to ##\psi_2##.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K