Experienced with PQ Control and PI Tuning for Inverter Power Control?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the modeling of active/reactive power management in inverters, specifically focusing on PQ control with voltage references. Participants are exploring challenges related to PI tuning and the influence of grid behavior on inverter performance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is attempting to implement PQ control in an inverter but is struggling with PI regulators, as the I_dq does not follow the references as expected.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of grid modeling, noting that the inverter's P and Q outputs are significantly influenced by the grid's behavior.
  • Questions are raised about determining the zero degree reference angle in phase with Ed and the role of actual system frequency in the control process.
  • A participant describes their grid modeling approach, using a fixed 3-phase sine source and discusses the orientation of grid voltage for decoupled power control.
  • There is a suggestion to imitate conventional power plant controls, proposing a dual-loop system for real power and voltage magnitude control.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about current control methods without classic hysteresis or bandwidth control, while acknowledging that some literature suggests these methods can be effective.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the modeling of the grid and the effectiveness of various control strategies. There is no consensus on the optimal approach to PI tuning or the best methods for achieving PQ control.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the lack of detailed assumptions regarding grid behavior and the specific mathematical steps involved in the proposed control strategies. The discussion reflects a range of experiences and approaches without resolving the underlying complexities.

GregoryGr
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have experience modeling active/reactive management in an inverter? I'm working on it for a project, more precisely I'm trying to implement that PQ control with references of voltage, as is seen in this image:

upload_2018-4-2_1-14-36.png


Problem is I've tried many PI regulators, and my I_dq doesn't want to follow the references. Does anybody have experience either on PQ control or in PI tuning (I suppose there is software that can find the optimal PI values? )
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-2_1-14-36.png
    upload_2018-4-2_1-14-36.png
    16.8 KB · Views: 768
Engineering news on Phys.org
How have you modeled the grid? The P and Q output is not determined entirely by the inverter, The grid's behavior plays a major role or even the dominant role.

How do you determine the zero degree reference angle in phase with Ed?

Where does actual system frequency come into play?

GregoryGr said:
I_dq
What is that?
 
anorlunda said:
How have you modeled the grid? The P and Q output is not determined entirely by the inverter, The grid's behavior plays a major role or even the dominant role.

How do you determine the zero degree reference angle in phase with Ed?

Where does actual system frequency come into play?What is that?

Hm, I haven't really modeled the grid, it's a fixated 3ph sine source with 400 polar voltage/50Hz and an inductance. What did you have in mind for the grid?

The approach was to orient the grid voltage so Vq = 0 as to use Iq and Id for decoupled power control (sensors are placed in the PCC). So in the image i posted in the modulator, the way i try to simulate it, is first to normalize Ed and Eq reference, and then dq->abc with the same angle the field orientation of the grid, which should in theory provide the necessary phase difference and amplitude to achieve PQ control...
(by Idq I meant both Id & Iq)

Thanks for the quick reply :)
 
GregoryGr said:
Hm, I haven't really modeled the grid, it's a fixated 3ph sine source with 400 polar voltage/50Hz and an inductance. What did you have in mind for the grid?

See this PF Insights article, especially the equations that describe P and Q flow between two adjacent nodes in a grid.
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/ac-power-analysis-part-2-network-analysis/

I think your inverter would work better by imitating conventional power plant controls. One loop to control real power by adjusting phase angle. Another loop to control voltage magnitude and therefore Q.

Control loops feeding back Id and Iq rather than V and ##\theta## sound strange to an old-timer like me.
 
Thank you, I will check this out. What you are suggesting I am currently experimenting with (and even though I haven't managed to work it out, it seems to be responding in the right direction! ). Truth be told, current control without classic hysterysis or bandwidth control seems strange to me too, but it seems to have worked in some papers... The reason I'm attempting that is because in general field control should have a better response.

The topic of my project is about DER sources, so convetional power controls should be on point!
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K