Experiment on mass of a photon

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the experimental investigation of the mass of a photon, particularly focusing on the idea of measuring the pressure exerted by photons on a pressure plate in a vacuum. Participants explore the implications of such experiments on the concept of relativistic mass and the momentum of photons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes an experiment to measure the pressure from photons on a plate, questioning if such an experiment has been conducted.
  • Another participant asserts that measuring momentum does not equate to measuring mass, suggesting that the experiment would primarily demonstrate photon momentum.
  • Several references are provided to existing literature and experiments that have sought to establish limits on photon mass, with some participants noting that these limits are model-dependent.
  • There is a discussion about the units used in particle physics, with confusion expressed over the conversion between energy and mass units.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the concept of light having mass, insisting on the need for direct evidence of light pushing a physical object.
  • Others clarify that the momentum of light can exert pressure without implying that photons have mass, referencing Maxwell's equations and established physics principles.
  • One participant challenges the validity of established equations, seeking empirical examples of light exerting force on objects.
  • Historical references are made to Einstein's work on light quanta and momentum exchange, with links to Nobel Prize-winning experiments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between photon momentum and mass, with some asserting that momentum can exist without mass, while others remain skeptical of this interpretation. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the experimental evidence for photon mass or the implications of photon momentum.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the limits on photon mass are dependent on specific models and that the interpretation of experimental results can vary. There is also mention of the complexity of units in particle physics, which may lead to misunderstandings.

  • #31
Slait said:
Everyone that sails too far west disappears, conclusion, the Earth is definitely flat. Cant argue with that logic
What does this even have to do with your rejection of VERIFIED science? The best I can do is tell you to take a look at a quantum mechanics textbook that discusses the mathematics behind the Compton Scattering. See, for example, Zettili's quantum mechanics book section 1.2.3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #33
Slait said:
Again, that equation is based on the energy. I want to see light pushing an object. I don't believe that it can. Science isn't a religion, something isn't true just because a book says so.

The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education. -Albert Einstein

I should say that it is your approach that it the 'religious' one, actually. You 'feel' something should be true yet you reject any evidence for the opposite view by just shifting your ground as new evidence is presented to you.
What is written in Science books (unlike religious texts) is the result of sufficient body of opinion and evidence and has evolved more than a little since Science books were first written. Text books are the effect and not the cause.

You want examples of 'light pushing things'? There are literally billions of photos of nuclear 'events' that indicate strongly that the principle of conservation of momentum is valid (by their self-consistency) and those recorded events involve taking the momentum of photons into account.

Just because those events don't happen to involve things on a scale of a torch pushing a tin can along the road doesn't invalidate the principle.

Also, if the pressure of light on satellites were not taken into account, they would be in the wrong places and with the wrong orientation.

You appear not to want to see these examples as confirmation of your erroneous view. Open your mind to a different interpretation from the one you have at present. Consider that Momentum may not always correspond to mv.
 
  • #34
You can only lead a horse to water. You cannot make it drink, even when you shove the water into its face.

This thread is done.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
562
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
5K