Expert Astrophotography Tips & Discussions | Share Your Photos!

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread focuses on sharing astrophotography tips, experiences, and photos among members of the Physics Forums community. Participants discuss various techniques, equipment, and personal experiences related to capturing celestial images, including specific events like lunar eclipses and planetary transits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a mosaic of the moon, noting that some areas were missed in the capture.
  • Another participant discusses their imaging technique for the Lagoon Nebula, mentioning the use of Photoshop for enhancing details.
  • There are references to the beauty of solar ice halos and the challenges of capturing them, with one participant sharing a personal anecdote about a reflective photo.
  • Several participants share their experiences and photos from a Venus transit, discussing the equipment used, including telescopes and digital cameras.
  • A participant expresses interest in solar art and questions if the thread is limited to astrophotography.
  • Discussions about camera types and settings arise, with participants sharing their setups and experiences with different cameras, including digital SLRs and point-and-shoot models.
  • Concerns about telescope maintenance and the effects of grease on performance are raised, with suggestions for cleaning and lubrication techniques.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of techniques and experiences without reaching a consensus on the best methods or equipment for astrophotography. Multiple viewpoints on camera types, settings, and maintenance practices are present, indicating an ongoing exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve personal anecdotes and subjective experiences, which may not be universally applicable. There are also mentions of specific technical challenges related to equipment maintenance that are not fully resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to amateur astronomers, photography enthusiasts, and those looking to improve their astrophotography skills or share their experiences with celestial imaging.

  • #181


Stanwyck66 said:
Could it be possible I saw the shadow of one of Jupiter's moons to the bottom left?
Not sure where you live or when that makes "last night", but Europa made a transit from 10:30PM EDT on 8/19 to 1:00 AM EDT on 8/20 and Io made a transit from 2-4PM EDT on 8/18.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #182


Jupiter, my new personal best!
 

Attachments

  • Jupiter-5-RGB-moons-12x8.jpg
    Jupiter-5-RGB-moons-12x8.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 675
Last edited:
  • #183


Very nice, Russ!
 
  • #184


russ_watters said:
Jupiter, my new personal best!

Whoa dude! El perfecto! Excellent clarity and detail... I understand the nearest object to the left in your photo is Neptune, is this correct?

I took my youngest son out to view Jupiter at its closest in 50 years and he was truly impressed. Then we went down to the 1m lensed telescope by the Planetarium... then he was like WOWed!

Cool!
 
  • #185


Thanks, guys.

baywax said:
I understand the nearest object to the left in your photo is Neptune, is this correct?
The two other objects in the photo are Ganymede and Io.
 
  • #186


russ_watters said:
Thanks, guys.


The two other objects in the photo are Ganymede and Io.

Ah... two of the 400 moons of Jupiter! thanks Russ!
 
  • #187


I got some photos of the lunar eclipse Tuesday morning.

I used a Nikon Coolpix 4500, with a Kenko 8x32mm monocular mounted to it. All photos were later resized to 40%.

Here's a shot of the full moon Monday night, a few hours before the start of the eclipse. I was mainly setting up the focus of the monocular + camera, so that I wouldn't have to use the autofocus feature later on.

FullMoon_2010Dec20.jpg


.

The total phase, about 3:40 a.m. Eastern USA time:

LunarEclipse_2010Dec21_Total01.jpg


.

The partial phase, 3:53 a.m.:

LunarEclipse_2010Dec21_Partial01.jpg


.

Two exposure settings for the partial phase, about 4:00 a.m. The right-hand photo gives me a real, and eerie, sense of the Earth casting its shadow onto the moon.

LunarEclipse_2010Dec21_Partial02.jpg
 
  • #188


Redbelly98 said:
I got some photos of the lunar eclipse Tuesday morning.

I used a Nikon Coolpix 4500, with a Kenko 8x32mm monocular mounted to it. All photos were later resized to 40%.

Here's a shot of the full moon Monday night, a few hours before the start of the eclipse. I was mainly setting up the focus of the monocular + camera, so that I wouldn't have to use the autofocus feature later on.

Far out Redbelly... we missed the whole thing due to cloud cover, so, thank you!
 
  • #190


Nice shoot, Russ. The limb darkening is striking. Is this a result of image processing? Is this a single shot, or stacked? I would probably need half a dozen stacked images to get one this bright using my Meade 8" ACF. I should probably try using my 'big' 10" SN scope, but, the little SC is easier to set up - no tube wrestling, counter weights, or polar alignment to mess with. I like bells and whistles when it's 10 degrees outside.
 
  • #191


Chronos said:
Nice shoot, Russ. The limb darkening is striking. Is this a result of image processing? Is this a single shot, or stacked? I would probably need half a dozen stacked images to get one this bright using my Meade 8" ACF. I should probably try using my 'big' 10" SN scope, but, the little SC is easier to set up - no tube wrestling, counter weights, or polar alignment to mess with. I like bells and whistles when it's 10 degrees outside.
You're talking about my Jupiter pic? It's something like 1500 stacked of each color for Jupiter, 200 each color for the moons, at different exposures. I've used Photoshop for overall brightness and contrast, but the gradient towards the limb is real. The outer planets don't have full phases like the inner ones, but unless it is exactly at opposition, one side will be a little darker than the other.

I don't know why you wouldn't be able to get it bright, though, it's just a matter of exposure and Jupiter is pretty bright. You should be able to get pictures with you 8" pretty close to what I've done. I'm shooting around 1/30th sec exposures.
 
  • #192
  • #193


DLuckyE said:
I took this one a while back

http://www.flickr.com/photos/doggettx/5264801104/

I tried it as a single shot at first but couldn't get detail on both the moon and Jupiter at the same time, so did 2 shots and combined them.

Nice! Any idea what the faint spot is, to the right of Jupiter and slightly out of the plane of the moons' orbits? (Easier to see in the http://www.flickr.com/photos/doggettx/5264801104/sizes/o/in/photostream/" .)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #194


Redbelly98 said:
Nice! Any idea what the faint spot is, to the right of Jupiter and slightly out of the plane of the moons' orbits? (Easier to see in the http://www.flickr.com/photos/doggettx/5264801104/sizes/o/in/photostream/" .)

I'm not sure, but I think that's Io
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #195


Wow, this thread has been here for 4 1/2 years! I started to read the 1st page before I realized the date, and what got me to realize it was so old was Turbo saying how expensive CCD's were lol.
 
  • #196


DLuckyE said:
I took this one a while back

http://www.flickr.com/photos/doggettx/5264801104/

I tried it as a single shot at first but couldn't get detail on both the moon and Jupiter at the same time, so did 2 shots and combined them.

This is really nice :)
 
  • #197


I recently purchased a canon T1i [500D] for astrophotography. The meade pro III ccd was disappointing. The sensor is just too small to yield a useful FOV. I hope it may still prove useful for autoguiding.
 
  • #198


I've been itching for another CCD or something myself. I'll probably wait until I can get better with my Meade DSI II before I get something else though. Even if it is a huge pain in the butt most of the time.
 
  • #199


I do not even own a telescope -_- I do look at the sky quite often, and since I have moved light pollution is very minimal. I need to get a telescope before the beginning of next year but am still researching which one to get. Lovely pictures on this thread :) one day I will be adding some of my own.
 
  • #200


You can get a 5-6 inch scope for pretty cheap. 100-200 bucks for a good deal, depending on what you want on it.
 
  • #201


Does anyone know where I can find data on meteor rates for various meteor showers? I was out last night with my T1i and tripod and managed to capture one. My shots are a little lacking though, and I spent a lot of time fiddling with my camera instead of watching the sky. I'd like to try again with some new settings and connect my laptop to the camera for automation, but I want to include some sweet, sweet math into the mix.

What I'm looking for is any data regarding the distribution of meteors in the sky by date, so I know roughly how many to expect given my view of the sky and I know when to stop looking. Any compiled data regarding the statistics of meteor distribution would be awesome.
 
  • #202


Just trying out setting on my camera and caught a plane and a meteor and thought I would share it. 30 second exposure F3 cheap GE 14.1 meg pix camera.
It's a nice camera the cheap part was the price.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/69555355@N07/6325503509/in/photostream/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #203


Nice! I don't even have a camera with adjustable exposure other than the one specifically for my telescope.
 
  • #204


sas3 said:
Just trying out setting on my camera and caught a plane and a meteor and thought I would share it. 30 second exposure F3 cheap GE 14.1 meg pix camera.
It's a nice camera the cheap part was the price.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/69555355@N07/6325503509/in/photostream/"
As Drakkith said ... nice! Even without the meteor.

I'm not spotting the plane, where is it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #205


The plane is the bright streak the meteor is to the right and much dimmer heading into the trees
 
  • #206


Haven't done much lately, but here's a shot of Jupiter last week, with Io passing in front of it. I took a dozen sets and the quality was inconsistent, but this is one of the better ones. I'm still working on processing and will probably put together an animation of most of the transit.
 

Attachments

  • Jupiter-Io-11-5-11--2138.jpg
    Jupiter-Io-11-5-11--2138.jpg
    11.3 KB · Views: 575
  • #207


One of my recent favorites, of the Andromeda Galaxy:

6118111104_fe55022412_b.jpg


- Warren
 
  • #208
There are lots of lovely shots here - I particularly like Russ' - I'm very impressed with the detail you got on those galaxies. I'm going to spend some time looking through all of these!

I feel a duty to link to my observatory's Astrophotography page. Not everything is up there - just some particularly nice shots people took through our old facility. We're currently in the process of setting up the main instrument at the new one.

http://www.bridgew.edu/Observatory/Astrophotography.cfm
Enjoy!

Edit: Wow, chroot - that's lovely. I'm confused as to how I missed it five minutes ago!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2K ·
81
Replies
2K
Views
276K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
18K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
23K