Calculate Prediction Accuracy Using Statistical Test

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yann
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate prediction accuracy between observed and predicted values, a common statistical test is the coefficient of determination, or R-squared, which indicates the percentage of variance explained by the model. The discussion highlights the need to understand the underlying distribution of the data, suggesting that if the data follows a normal distribution, one should estimate the mean and variance using unbiased estimators. The importance of comparing the predicted values to the actual observed values is emphasized to determine the accuracy of the prediction model. The conversation seeks clarity on the specific method used to quantify how well the predictions explain variations in the observed data. Understanding these statistical methods is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of predictive equations.
Yann
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I have two sets of data. The first is the observed value for a number of objects, the second is the predicted value for those objects. I want to know how much, in %, my equation is able to predict. What's the name of the statistical test to know that ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yann said:
I have two sets of data. The first is the observed value for a number of objects, the second is the predicted value for those objects. I want to know how much, in %, my equation is able to predict. What's the name of the statistical test to know that ?
What "equation" are you talking about? Are you under the impression that this question makes any sense at all?
 
Lets say you have a number of species and you know their size S;

(S1, S2, S3 .. Sn)...

Then, you have an equation to predict the size on those animals. So you have another "vector" with predicted size P;

(P1, P2, P3 ... Pn)...

In an article, the author said his equation (the one he used to get P1, P2...) explains X% of the variation in size, but he doesn't give any clue to the method he used to find that %. I just want to know what's the name of the method he used, how can you know how much the predicted size explains the variations in the observed size ?
 
What I understood it correctly is as follows:

U have an equation y=f(x), to find the size of the animal.
Now to find its accuracy, u take a sample of size n (i.e. ur observed value) n try to find the % of variation by comparing the values of actual n observed one…
One simple method is
Find out which distribution the random variable X (the size) follows.
If it follows normal distribution, then try to estimate the mean n variance of it by using some unbiased estimator (for any other distribution, estimate the unknown parameter of the PDF).
Hope u can do the needful… good luck
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top