B Explanation for increase of degree of equation

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
So say that I have the quadratic equation ##x^2 - 2x +1 = 0##. If I multiply each side by ##x##, a valid operation, I get the new equation ##x^3 - 2x^2 + x = 0##, which has a different solution set as the first, namely ##\left\{ {0, 1}\right\}##. If I make the substitution ##x^2 = 2x -1 = 0##, then I now have ##x^3 - 2(2x - 1) + x = x^3 - 3x + 2##, which has the solution set ##\left\{ {-2,1}\right\}##. I could repeat this process ad infinitum, but I am just wondering what is going on. If I am just doing valid operations and making valid substitutions, then why is the solution set constantly changing from what is originally was, i.e, ##\left\{ {1}\right\}##?

Also, given that I transformed ##x^2 - 2x + 1 = 0## to ##x^3 - 3x + 2 = 0##, is there any way to go in the reverse direction, that is, to start with ##x^3 - 3x + 2 = 0## and go to ##x^2 - 2x + 1 = 0##?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:
So say that I have the quadratic equation ##x^2 - 2x +1 = 0##. If I multiply each side by ##x##, a valid operation, I get the new equation ##x^3 - 2x^2 + x = 0##, which has a different solution set as the first, namely ##\left\{ {0, 1}\right\}##. If I make the substitution ##x^2 = 2x -1 = 0##, then I now have ##x^3 - 2(2x - 1) + x = x^3 - 3x + 2##, which has the solution set ##\left\{ {-2,1}\right\}##. I could repeat this process ad infinitum, but I am just wondering what is going on. If I am just doing valid operations and making valid substitutions, then why is the solution set constantly changing from what is originally was, i.e, ##\left\{ {1}\right\}##?
The only change you're making is to enlarge the solution set.

If you leave your equations in factored form, it should be more obvious.
##(x - 1)^2 = 0## Solution {1}
##x(x - 1)^2 = 0## Solution {0, 1}
In your third equation, what you've done seems murky as you have written it, but if ##x^2 = 2x - 1##, then ##x^2 - 2x + 1 = 0## or ##(x - 1)^2 = 0##. Multiplying both sides by ##(x - 1)^2## raises the degree of the polynomial to 5, but there are no new values in the solution set.
Mr Davis 97 said:
Also, given that I transformed ##x^2 - 2x + 1 = 0## to ##x^3 - 3x + 2 = 0##, is there any way to go in the reverse direction, that is, to start with ##x^3 - 3x + 2 = 0## and go to ##x^2 - 2x + 1 = 0##?
Factor it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top