Explanation of Torque in the precession of a top.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concept of gravitational torque in the context of a spinning top as described in Taylor's Classical Mechanics. The confusion arises from the statement that "the gravitational torque is clockwise," which is interpreted through the right-hand rule. When applying this rule, the torque vector points into the page, indicating a counterclockwise rotation when viewed from above. However, if the top were released from rest, it would indeed fall in a clockwise direction, aligning with the gravitational torque's effect on the top's motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with torque and angular momentum concepts
  • Knowledge of the right-hand rule for vector direction
  • Basic grasp of precession in rotating systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of torque in rotational dynamics
  • Explore the effects of angular momentum on precession
  • Review examples of gravitational torque in different systems
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of precession in rigid bodies
USEFUL FOR

Students of classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of rotational motion and torque dynamics.

student335
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm reading through Taylor's Classical Mechanics, and I am confused by one sentence in section 10.6

The image he is referencing is this
1m822Pk.png


while the text is here.
1jUcx3c.png


Specifically the statement "the gravitational torque is clockwise"

Using the right hand-rule, I run my fingers along the e3 vector and curl down for gravity, so my thumb points into the screen, which is exactly what Taylor says when the torque vector is into the page. This means that, if I am looking at the top from above (the z-axis) I will see it rotating in the counterclockwise direction. This all I understand.

But what is he talking about when he says the gravitational torque is clockwise?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree, the wording is not entirely clear. Maybe he means that if the top were not spinning and you released the top from rest in the position shown, then the gravitational torque would cause the top to fall in the direction of increasing θ. That is, the top would rotate about the origin in the clockwise direction from our point of view. But, of course, the spinning top does not fall appreciably and, instead, precesses couterclockwise around the z axis from the point of view of looking down on the top from above if ##\vec{\omega}## is along e3.
 
That's what I thought too. The way we're looking at the top in the picture, if it dropped it would fall in a clockwise direction (assuming it was connected to the origin).

Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K