Exploding object (momentum problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter TraceBusta
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving conservation of momentum and kinetic energy related to an exploding projectile. Jay and Dave plan to launch a stink bomb that explodes into two fragments, and the calculations focus on determining the distance one fragment lands from them and the energy released during the explosion. The correct approach involves calculating the horizontal velocity at the time of the explosion and using conservation of momentum to find the velocities of the fragments. For kinetic energy, the total energy before the explosion is compared to the energy of the fragments after the explosion to determine the explosion's energy. The participants emphasize the importance of using the correct equations and components to solve the problem accurately.
TraceBusta
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Well I think conservation of momentum is needed here.

Jay and Dave decide that the best way to protest the opening of a new incinerator is to launch a stink bomb into the middle of the ceremony. They calculate that a 5.5 kg projectile launched with an initial speed of 36 m/s at an angle of 30° will do the trick. The bomb will explode on impact, no one will get hurt, but everyone will stink. Perfect. However, at the top of its flight, the bomb explodes into two fragments, each having a horizontal trajectory. To top it off--this really isn't their day--the 1.8 kg fragment lands right at the feet of Dave and Jay.

(a) How far from Dave and Jay does the 3.7 kg fragment land?
(b) Find the energy of the explosion by comparing the kinetic energy of the projectiles just before and just after the explosion.

I first solved the x-velocity of the object at the time of explosion (Vx=Vo cos theta) which i think is right. So using that, i solved for P. Then I solved the velocity of the small object and time it took to land at their feet. so i could solve for the velocity of the big object by using 5.5 kg*Vx=3.7 kg*v-(1.8 kg*V1.8) And then I just used that velocity and the same time the other object was in the air to find the distance. I got 99.728m for a but that is wrong. I don't know how to start (b) either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The time of explosion is when the vertical velocity = 0 (since it is at the top of the path). Use this info when calculating...

part B just involves finding the kinetic energy of the object before it explodes, which is:

KE= 1/2mv^2

THe KE afterwards would just be the same thing, except for both objects.

KE(total) = KE(object 1) + KE(object 2).

Note that the potential energy is not factored into the equation, because the objects before and after the explosion are still at the same height, and thus have the same potential energy, as Potential Energy = mgh.
 


Your approach using conservation of momentum is correct. To solve for the distance, you need to use the same initial velocity and angle to solve for the x and y components of the velocity of the 3.7 kg fragment. Then use those components to find the distance it travels in the x direction. For part (b), you can use the equation for kinetic energy (KE=1/2*m*v^2) to compare the kinetic energy before and after the explosion. The initial kinetic energy would be the sum of the kinetic energy of the 5.5 kg and 1.8 kg fragments, and the final kinetic energy would be the kinetic energy of the 3.7 kg fragment. This will give you the energy of the explosion.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K