Exploring Cold Fusion: Future of Energy?

In summary, the article claims that an Italian physicist has made a cold fusion machine and it has recently passed an important test. It is unknown how the machine works, but it is supposedly a way to create energy without the need for high temperatures or radiation. Hagelstein seems to be bitter about the future of energy being in the hands of the general public and does not seem to believe in the machine.f
  • #1
49
0
So, I was reading something today about an Italian Physicist who supposidly was able to make a cold fusion machine. It recently passed an important test and all that crap, and it will be interesting to see where it goes, but I was wondering how exactly cold fusion works? I get the jist of it, that its basically combining two elements to create a large amount of energy without the need of high temperatures or harmful radiation, but how exactly does it work?

I think it will be interesting to see if this go through. It will feel like a big weight being lifted off my shoulders (The future of energy being in the hands of my generation.)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45153076/ns/technology_and_science-science/" [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2
No one knows how it works because no one has ever shown it to work. This article, as with almost every mainstream non-scientific media article, is probably filled with inaccuracies and non-sense.

I'd bet good money on this being garbage.
 
  • #3
There is no known mechanism for nuclei to fuse in any appreciable numbers without being so ridiculously hot that the material is a plasma being confined by magnetic fields or by inertia in an implosion (or perhaps being blasted by a nuclear bomb, but that's not a very productive approach for producing electricity). Nuclear fusion cross-sections are simply ridiculously small at room-ish temperatures, and typically nuclear fusion explanations for apparent heat output from these schemes would require that the experimenters be dead - it's false that nuclear fusion does not produce dangerous radiation. It's another perpetual motion machine, though that does not say that there aren't some potentially interesting chemical or even nuclear interactions going on.

I see Hagelstein seems not to have lost any of his bitterness towards the DOE.
 
  • #4

Suggested for: Exploring Cold Fusion: Future of Energy?

Replies
11
Views
529
Replies
6
Views
751
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
996
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
799
Replies
2
Views
826
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
934
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top