MHB What Do the Symbols $\equiv$, =>, and <=> Mean in Mathematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dethrone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms Notation
AI Thread Summary
The symbol "$\equiv$" denotes equivalence, indicating that two expressions are equivalent for all values of the variable, unlike "=" which signifies equality for specific values. "$\Rightarrow$" is commonly used to represent implication, showing that one statement leads to another, while "$\Leftrightarrow$" indicates a biconditional relationship, meaning both statements are true or false together. The "$\equiv$" symbol can also mean "by definition" in certain contexts. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for proper mathematical communication. Overall, recognizing the appropriate use of these symbols enhances clarity in mathematical expressions.
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
First day of school and I don't have much work. So I got bored and read ahead a bit. From a textbook my prof wrote:
282qt95.jpg


Can someone explain why they used the "$\equiv$"? I think it means "equivalent", but I'm not sure, but when are times you want to use that symbol rather than "equals"? What's the difference between the two, and any examples of other usages of the symbol, or when you would use one over the other?

Other symbols of confusion: "=>". I generally use this to mean "implies", like $3x+y=6 => y=6-3x$. How about that versus "<=>" which I also don't see too often. Any other symbols of importance? (Wondering)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Rido12 said:
First day of school and I don't have much work. So I got bored and read ahead a bit. From a textbook my prof wrote:Can someone explain why they used the "$\equiv$"? I think it means "equivalent", but I'm not sure, but when are times you want to use that symbol rather than "equals"? What's the difference between the two, and any examples of other usages of the symbol, or when you would use one over the other?

Other symbols of confusion: "=>". I generally use this to mean "implies", like $3x+y=6 => y=6-3x$. How about that versus "<=>" which I also don't see too often. Any other symbols of importance? (Wondering)

Two expressions are equal for some specific value of the
variable, when they yield the same number,but they are equivalent when
they are equal for any value of the variable. Two equations are equivalent when they have the same solution set.It is not used to say that two equations are equal.
Two sets are equivalent when they have the same number of
elements,but they are equal if they have exactly the same elements.

$\Leftrightarrow$ is the symbol of "if and only if",at which the truth of either one of the connected statements requires the truth of the other, either both statements are true, or both are false
 
Last edited:
In the context of the above picture, the $\equiv$ symbol means "by definition".
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top