How Many Gamma-Ray Bursts Occur in Each Galaxy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter granpa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy Per
AI Thread Summary
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) occur approximately once per day, leading to an estimated 36 bursts per galaxy over 10 billion years, given around 100 billion galaxies in the observable universe. GRBs are primarily linked to hypernovae, which arise from massive, low-metallicity stars, although other mechanisms like binary neutron star mergers may also contribute. The occurrence rate of GRBs is believed to decrease over time as the universe ages. Long and short GRBs are categorized based on their duration, with the hypernova model specifically addressing long bursts. The exploration of GRBs continues to evolve, with ongoing research seeking to validate various theories in cosmology.
granpa
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
7
GRB's occur once per day. over 10 billion years that's 3650 billion bursts (in the observable universe?). I think there are said to be around 100 billion galaxies in the observable universe so does that mean that 36 bursts occur in each galaxy?

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/astronomy/faq/part8/section-4.html

I wonder how large a galaxy has to be before it has a supermassive black hole?

I wonder how many globular clusters there are and how that compares to the number 3650 billion?
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
GRB's are high redshift events [the nearest suspect occurred at a distance estimated at over 30 Mpc], meaning they are relics of the distant past. Scientists believe hypernova are responsible for most GRB's. They are thought to arise from enormous, pristine [little or no metallicity] Pop I stars. Such stars do not exist in the Milky Way, or other nearby galaxies [gas clouds are too heavily polluted]. The rate of occurence is thought to be time dependent [frequency steadily decreases as universe ages].
 
30 megaparsecs is only 100 million lightyears.
 
Indeed, 30 Mpc is z~.1 which is a little too close for comfort to support the hypernova hypothesis. It is suspected more exotic mechanisms may also exist, such as binary neutron star mergers. No one is quite sure what might happen in those cases, but, they are rare events. High redshift hypernova's, however, reasonably account for the vast majority of GRB's. Cosmology is always full of surprises and outlier observations evoke a great deal of interest. Most scientists take a wait and see attitude when a rogue observation contradicts reasonably well established theories. Many explanations are possible. Unfortunately the resources necessary to validate [or invalidate] them are precious and most researchers are unwilling to gamble their grant money on hitting a home run. It's the nature of the beast. The need to conduct daring experiments is often obviated by more mainstream studies. Clever scientists find ways to squeeze exotic information from these more 'mainstream' studies - a low risk, high reward opportunity. They are fond of referring to this as serendipity [a technobable term meaning 'lucky guess'].
 
Hello Chronos and granpa,

A few comments.

There are two types of GRB's, long bursts and short bursts ( > few seconds and < few seconds respectively). The hypernova model only attempts to explain long GRB bursts. Hypernova are not necessarily stars formed early in the universe ( Chronos had a typo, he meant the early pristine stars are population II or III stars), they are just really massive stars (rapidly spinning Wolf-Rayet stars).
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
218
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top