Which Type of Brass is Most Susceptible to Corrosion in Experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Buster123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Corrosion
AI Thread Summary
Brass, an alloy of copper and zinc, is generally resistant to corrosion, but certain types are more susceptible. For experiments involving corrosion with common bases, acids, and salts, selecting brass with higher zinc content may yield more visible results due to a process called dezincification. Researching specific brass alloys, particularly those with a lower copper-to-zinc ratio, can help identify the most vulnerable types. Engaging with corrosion specialists or consulting dedicated resources on brass corrosion can provide valuable insights. Choosing the right type of brass is crucial for achieving the desired experimental outcomes.
Buster123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have been given the task to corrode brass with common base, acid and salt. I understand that it is an alloy of copper and zinc and is actually designed not to rust. Before I begin the experiment, I am looking for the best TYPE of brass to use in this experiment. Given that there appears to be hundreds of different types of brass with different properties, which type will give me the best chance for visible results?


Homework Equations


Brass is an alloy of copper and zinc


The Attempt at a Solution


I have looked all over the internet... and have contacted several "brass wholesale suppliers" who have simply stated that they are not "scientists."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Include "dezincification" in your search for brass. You want a brass that is http://corrosion-doctors.org/MatSelect/corrbrass.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top