Exploring the Effects of Space Time Expansion on Unbound Bodies

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
It is my understanding, that space time is expanding, and that
gravitationally bound bodies will stay unaffected by this expansion
while unbound bodies will.
but is gravity the only force that can overcome this effect?
could magnetic or electro static forces hold bodies in station?
I do not propose this as an alternative theory, rather i want to
know if the mentioned forces grow with ST
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wolram said:
It is my understanding, that space time is expanding, and that
gravitationally bound bodies will stay unaffected by this expansion
while unbound bodies will.
but is gravity the only force that can overcome this effect?
could magnetic or electro static forces hold bodies in station?
I do not propose this as an alternative theory, rather i want to
know if the mentioned forces grow with ST

What you are really asking is,what is the Cosmic Scale Factor for Gravitational Energies?

Try here:http://www.superstringtheory.com/forum/dualboard/messages9/3.html

its a old posting (about 16 months ago) , that happens to have some far reaching insights contained.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Olias said:
What you are really asking is,what is the Cosmic Scale Factor for Gravitational Energies?

Try here:http://www.superstringtheory.com/forum/dualboard/messages9/3.html

its a old posting (about 16 months ago) , that happens to have some far reaching insights contained.

Great link Olias

I hope some will comment on the thought process that was detailed.

It seems valid for our converstaion in strings/lqg thread in regards to smolin
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Olias
L is not that clearly identified as torque as in my G = xy, but in g of equation (1) we have Lc^2 r/3 so that L is just throwing in r* factor essentially and the whole g composite looks like a "vacuum energy" torque. Regarding L as a force, on the other hand, then we have a torque (admittedly with a rather unusual force arm) and from the r" equation the g term eventually dominates in r". r" is like a force without a mass in the Newtonian "ma" force picture, but I suppose that L contributes its own "mass"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have had some difficulty digesting this, I have read the article several times
now and i think i understand, but because i have only just climbed out of my
tree a little more insight would be appreciated.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top