I How Can LASER Be Both a Quantum and Classical Light Source?

Muthumanimaran
Messages
79
Reaction score
2
My question is the physics behind the LASER such as stimulated emission can be only explained by quantum mechanics only. We can represent LASER as coherent state in quantum mechanics only. Then how can we say LASER can be thought of a classical light source?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's a "classical light source"?
 
According to my understanding, classical light source is something we can able to describe using classical electromagnetism. I have this confusion because, when you say LASER, we talk bunch of photons in phase. Does this violate uncertainty principle between phase and photon number? $$\Delta{N}\Delta{\phi}\geq 1$$
so we can regard them as classical light source?
 
Last edited:
Quantum mechanics is needed to describe the production of laser light, but the light itself can be called "classical" as it can be described as a solution of the classical Maxwell equations. This is in contrast to states of light that have only quantum description, without being solutions of the classical Maxwell equations.

Coherent state (has classical description): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherent_state
Squeezed state (has no classical description): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeezed_states_of_light
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DrClaude, Muthumanimaran and berkeman
atyy said:
Quantum mechanics is needed to describe the production of laser light, but the light itself can be called "classical" as it can be described as a solution of the classical Maxwell equations. This is in contrast to states of light that have only quantum description, without being solutions of the classical Maxwell equations.

Coherent state (has classical description): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherent_state
Squeezed state (has no classical description): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeezed_states_of_light
got it
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top