Why Does Kinetic Energy Depend on the Square of Speed?

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy depends on the square of speed due to its definition, which aligns with dimensional analysis showing energy units as kg*m^2/s^2. The relationship can be derived from Newton's second law, where the work-energy theorem connects force, distance, and velocity, leading to the formula E = m*v^2/2. This squared dependency also distinguishes kinetic energy from momentum, which is linearly related to speed. The physical interpretation suggests that kinetic energy reflects the energy of motion without directional dependence. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping fundamental physics concepts.
lella
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why is it that kinetic energy depends on the square of speed instead of simply speed? Is there an example that shows why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lella said:
Why is it that kinetic energy depends on the square of speed instead of simply speed? Is there an example that shows why?


Its really just because that's the definition of kinetic energy. Momentum is defined as the quantity that depends on the speed linearly.
 
That's a very interesting question - sure its defined that way, but why?

I suppose this isn't truly a satisfatory answer, but we could use dimensional analysis to show that it indeed must be squared:

In SI, we're looking for energy in kg*m^2/s^2

Potentional energy: m*g*h so (kg)(m/s^2)(m) looks good

Kinetic Energy: m*v^2 (kg)(m/s)^2 looks good too!

As far as a "deeper" reason, I don't think I can add anything off hand.
 
The guy above is cute. But I have another explanation.
If the mass is M, and at the beginning it rested on the non-fiction ground.
Then we give it a force F.
We know that after S meters' movement, the kientic of the mass will be E=F*S ;
but now we will express it in another way, with the V and M.
we know the acceleration of the mass is a = F/M
and there is the relation S = V^2/(2*a) = V^2/(2*F/M)=MV^2/(2F)
So E = F*S = MV^2/2
it is the kinetic.:approve:
 
You can get it from the second Newton's law
F=m*dv/dt

According to Work(W)-Energy(E) theorem we have the definition of kinetic energy
dE=dW=F*dx=F*v*dt=m*v*dv=d(m*v^2/2)

From which we get the kinetic energy
E = m*v^2/2

Hope this helps

Prof. Nikitin,
My Quick Online Physics Reference Guide and Help:
http://physics-help.info
 
From a pure foundation and without the benefit of hindsight, the answer of course, is that it is not necessary that kinetic energy be dependant on the square of velocity. This could only have been (and was, by Joule) determined empiracally. The other answer is because momentum, which is the quantity of motion, already does.

Kinetic energy is the energy of motion, it [energy] allows us to note a change of some system's state with respect to time. It also makes sense physically that kinetic energy would depend on the square of velocity since its value does not depend on direction.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top