Using the Mean Value Theorem to Solve Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Mean Value Theorem in solving logarithmic equations, particularly focusing on proving the existence of roots and solving specific equations. Participants explore various types of problems related to the theorem, including proving that certain equations have unique solutions and finding all solutions to given equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to summarize the Mean Value Theorem and its applications, presenting examples and problems they are struggling with. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the nature of the solutions, particularly in relation to integer constraints. Others suggest starting points for solving the equations presented.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and suggestions. Some have identified potential solutions to the second problem, while others are still exploring the first problem's requirements and constraints. There is a mix of attempts to clarify concepts and share reasoning without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a discrepancy regarding the integer constraints in the first problem, indicating a need for further exploration of the implications of these constraints. The second problem remains largely open-ended, with participants expressing uncertainty about how to approach it.

VietDao29
Homework Helper
Messages
1,424
Reaction score
3
Hi,

Okay, I just went over some old stuff this week to prepare for the next vast vast, upcoming test.

I came across a Logarithmic Equation book, well, it's more than 300 pages long, it covers most things from Exponential to Logarithm. :woot: I have read about 1/4 of it, and I was stuck. :cry:

There are some problems there, but it's like they give out 10 problems, and they only guide you to solve 2, or 3 of them. And the others, you have to do it on your own. >"<

The chapter I was reading was about Using the Mean Value Theorem to Equations. Here's a brief (well, not-so-short, to put it exactly) summary of this chapter, in case anyone needs it :smile:. The problems I stuck on are at the end of the post.

---------------------------------

Sumary:

Firstly, the book states the Lagrange's theorem:
If f(x) is continuous on the interval [a; b], and f(x) is differentiable on [a; b], then there will always exist a c on (a; b) such that:
f&#039;(c) = \frac{f(b) - f(a)}{b - a}​

Then, it says that there are 2 kinds of problems:

The first type:: Prove that the equation f(x) = 0 has root(s):

First step is to find F(x), the anti-derivative of f(x), differentiable, and continuous on the interval [a; b], such that: F(b) - F(a) = 0.

Then, there exists an x0 on (a; b), such that:
F&#039;(x_0) = \frac{F(b) - F(a)}{b - a} = 0 \Rightarrow f(x_0) = 0
So that means the equation f(x) = 0 has at least one root on (a; b).

Example:

Given a/3 + b/2 + c = 0, prove that
a22x + b2x + c = 0 always has solution.

Solution:

Let t = 2x ~~> t > 0
Consider F(t) = (a/3)t3 + (b/2)t2 + ct. It's differentiable, and continuous on (0 ; \infty )

F'(t) = at2 + bt + c = a22x + b2x + c

F(1) - F(0) = (a/3 + b/2 + c) - 0 = a/3 + b/2 + c = 0

So, the equation F'(t) = 0 (i.e at2 + bt + c = 0) always has solution on he interval (0; 1), hence, the former equation also has solution (Q.E.D)

The second type:: Solve an equation:

First step is to assume that \alpha is the solution to the equation.

Re-arrange the equation into the form f(a) = f(b), from there, find the appropriate f(t), continuous, and differentiable on [a; b].

Then, by using the Mean Value Theorem, we'll solve for \alpha.

And the last step is to check the solution.

Example:

Solve:

6x + 2x = 5x + 3x

Solution:

Re-arrange the equation to give:

6x - 5x = 3x - 2x

Assume that \alpha is the solution to the above equation. So, we have:

6 ^ \alpha - 5 ^ \alpha = 3 ^ \alpha - 2 ^ \alpha (1)

Let f(t) = (t + 1) ^ \alpha - t ^ \alpha, \ \ \ \ \ t &gt; 0, from (1), we have: f(5) = f(2)

By the Mean Value Theorem, there exists a c on the interval (2; 5), such that:

f&#039;(c) = \frac{f(5) - f(2)}{5 - 2} = 0 \Rightarrow \alpha (c + 1) ^ {\alpha - 1} - \alpha c ^ {\alpha - 1} = 0

\Rightarrow \alpha \left[ (c + 1) ^ {\alpha - 1} - c ^ {\alpha - 1} \right] = 0 \Rightarrow \left[ \begin{array}{l} \alpha = 0 \\ \alpha = 1 \end{array} \right.

So, the two solution to the equation is x = 0, or x = 1. After testing the two solution, we see that they are all valid.

Example:

Solve for x:

3cos(x) - 2cos(x) = cos(x)

Solution:

Re-arrange the equation to give:

3cos(x) -3 cos(x) = 2cos(x) - 2cos(x)

Assume that \alpha is the solution to the equation, we have:
3 ^ {\cos (\alpha) } - 3 \cos \alpha = 2 ^ {\cos (\alpha)} - 2 \cos \alpha (2)

Let f(t) = t ^ {\cos \alpha} - t \cos \alpha

From (2), we have: f(3) = f(2)

Applying the Mean Value Theorem, we have:

There exists a c on (2, 3), such that:

f&#039;(c) = 0 \Rightarrow \left[c ^ {\cos \alpha} - 1 \right] \cos \alpha = 0 \Rightarrow \left[ \begin{array}{l} \cos \alpha = 0 \\ \cos \alpha = 1 \end{array} \right.

\Rightarrow \left[ \begin{array}{l} \alpha = \frac{\pi}{2} + k \pi \\ \alpha = 2 k&#039; \pi \end{array} \right. , \ \ \ \ \ k, k&#039; \in \mathbb{Z}

Testing the two solutions above, we see that they are all valid, so there are 2 solution to the equation:

\Rightarrow \left[ \begin{array}{l} x = \frac{\pi}{2} + k \pi \\ x = 2 k&#039; \pi \end{array} \right. , \ \ \ \ \ k, k&#039; \in \mathbb{Z}

------------------------

Pfff, so, well, it's the summary.

And there are 2 problems I stuck on:

Problem 1:
Given a, b, c in Z+, i.e {1, 2, 3, 4, ...}, and a2 + b2 = c2

Prove that:
ax + bx = cx only has one solution.

Attempt:

a2 + b2 = c2 means that c > a, and c . b.

Divide both sides by cx, to get:

(a/c)x + (b/c)x = 1

The LHS is a decreasing function, hence, if there is root to the equation, it cannot be more than 1.

From the given condition, one can see that x = 2 is the only solution. :)

It seems correct. Except that I haven't used the fact that a, b, and c are in Z+, my solution is valid for, a, b, and c in R+. So, I think I must be missing something here. :frown:

Is it me, or the book mistype the Z+ thingy? Or does the book expect me to solve it in another way?

Problem 2:

Find all solution to the equation:
(1 + cos x)(2 + 4cos(x)) = 3 (4cos x)

Well, I have absolutely no idea how to start it. :cry: :cry: Some body please give me a start.

Thanks very much. :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey,
Just looking at it before I tried anything, I see that cos x=1 is a solution.
So anywhere cos(x)=0 is a solution.
CC
 
happyg1 said:
Hey,
Just looking at it before I tried anything, I see that cos x=1 is a solution.
So anywhere cos(x)=0 is a solution.
CC

Yeah, even cos(x) = 1/2 is a solution, I got it when using Trial-and-Error method frantically. But, well, I cannot factor this expression, or re-arrange it to any desirable form. :frown:
 
Allright,
So I multiplied it out and I got:(letting cos(x)=a for easiness)
2+2a+a4^a+4^a=3(4^a)
Then I used the following:
2=4-2
2a=4a-2a
2(4^a)=4(4^a)-2(2^a)
a4^a=2a4^a-a4^a
which gives:
4+4a+2a4^a-4(4^a)=2+2a+a4^a-2(2^a)
So I think that works.
CC
 
happyg1 said:
Allright,
So I multiplied it out and I got:(letting cos(x)=a for easiness)
2+2a+a4^a+4^a=3(4^a)
Then I used the following:
2=4-2
2a=4a-2a
2(4^a)=4(4^a)-2(2^a)
a4^a=2a4^a-a4^a
which gives:
4+4a+2a4^a-4(4^a)=2+2a+a4^a-2(2^a)
So I think that works.
CC

Yeah, yeah, it works. :approve: Thanks a lot, mate.

Btw, I have one question. How can you split it into that form, is there anything that suggest you to do that, or you get it by chance? I don't think I can think of that re-arrangement though. :redface:
 
I just looked at the form of the terms and realizing that I needed the same types of terms on both sides of the equation, just divided each one up. After I multiplied it out and canceled the one 4^a term, I saw that the 4's and 2's for the coefficients would probably work. With just a little tinkering the thing fell out.

I didn't solve it past that. What did you get for solutions? Was the cos(x)=1 and cos(x)=1/2 all there were?
CC
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K