Expressing recursive sequences explicitly

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nathanael
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
Nathanael
Homework Helper
Messages
1,650
Reaction score
246
Take, for example, ##x_{n+1}=x_n+2+4n\text{ with }x_0=0##. How would you express this explicitly in terms of n?

The only method I've thought of is to assume it's of the form ##x_n=an^2+bn+c## and then write out the first few terms ##\{x_0=0,x_1=2,x_2=8\}## to get a system of equations for the constants a,b,c:

##c=0##
##a+b+c=2##
##4a+2b+c=8##
##\Rightarrow x_n=2n^2##

Does anyone have another method?Suppose I have ##x_{n+1}=x_n+2^n##. I can still find ##x_n## explicitly in the same way by assuming it's of the form ##a2^n+b##

So, if I had something like ##x_{n+1}=x_n+\sqrt{n}+n^{-\pi}##, should I then assume it's of the form ##an^{3/2}+bn^{1-\pi}+c## ?But now what about something with a nonlinear dependence on xn, like ##x_{n+1}=(n^2+n)x_n+1## or maybe even ##x_{n+1}=2^{x_n}+n##. Are there any general methods for solving these types of problems?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have brought up an interesting topic. It is field of active research with ties to numerous other fields of pure and applied mathematics, e.g. dynamical systems, number theory, orthogonal polynomials.
Nathanael said:
But now what about something with a nonlinear dependence on ##x_n##, like ##x_{n+1}=(n^2+n)x_n+1##
This is still linear in ##x_n##. More precisely, it's a one-dimensional, linear non-homogeneous (because of the ##1## on the right) recurrence with non-constant (because of the ##n^2 + n## in front of ##x_n## ) coefficients.
Nathanael said:
Are there any general methods for solving these types of problems?
You may enjoy: S. Elaydi, An Introduction to Difference Equations, Springer, 3rd Edition, 2005. Incidentally, in general the answer is "no". For example, the famous logistic map ##x \mapsto r x(1 - x)## looks very simple, but may display so-called "chaotic" behavior, depending on the value of the parameter ##r##.
 
  • Like
Likes Nathanael and PeroK
Try telescoping the terms : ## x_n - x_0 = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} (x_{k+1} - x_k)##
 
  • Like
Likes Nathanael
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
977
Replies
125
Views
19K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top