Expressing x is a Real Number and Not 1: Quick Notation Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Char. Limit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
To express "x is a real number and not 1," the notation x ∈ ℝ ∧ x ≠ 1 is commonly used, but alternatives exist. A more concise way is to use the notation x ∈ ℝ \ {1}, which clearly indicates that x belongs to the set of real numbers excluding 1. This notation effectively communicates the same condition in a simpler format. Participants in the discussion confirm that the latter notation is preferable for clarity and brevity. Overall, using x ∈ ℝ \ {1} is recommended for expressing this mathematical concept.
Char. Limit
Gold Member
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
23
I was wondering how to express "x is a real number and not 1". What's the best way to express this? Right now I'm using...

x \epsilon \mathbb{R} \wedge x \neq 1

But I'm sure there's a better way.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Char. Limit said:
I was wondering how to express "x is a real number and not 1". What's the best way to express this? Right now I'm using...

x \epsilon \mathbb{R} \wedge x \neq 1

But I'm sure there's a better way.

Use the notation x = R \ {1}
 
chiro said:
Use the notation x = R \ {1}

Got it, thanks!
 

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Similar threads

B More convenient mathematical notation for a simple use case
Replies
6
Views
2K
I (0,1) is uncountable using binary expansions?
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Zero raised to a positive real number
Replies
12
Views
2K
B The infinitesimal in Calculus
Replies
18
Views
2K
I Is it valid to express a complex number as a vector?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Definition of minimal ideal using symbolic logic notation
Replies
3
Views
624
I Induced orientation on boundary of ##\mathbb{H}^n## in ##\mathbb{R}^n##
Replies
6
Views
2K
Insights What Are Numbers?
Replies
13
Views
4K
B General explicit solution to polynomial interpolation
Replies
3
Views
2K
What are extended real numbers
Replies
1
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top