What Is the Expression for Circular Wave Displacement in a Pond?

In summary: Therefore, the conversation is about finding an expression for the displacement of a circular wave created by a stone dropped into a pond. The Hankel function, which solves the Laplace equation for the velocity potential in cylindrical coordinates, is the most appropriate wave function. The displacement at a certain distance away from the origin can be found by using the asymptotic form of the Bessel function, which falls off at a rate proportional to 1/√r. However, there is no simple expression for the displacement that contains the Bessel function. Additionally, in electromagnetics, the Bessel function is a standing wave and the Hankel function is a traveling wave.
  • #1
scepter
3
0
Hi all.
I´m looking for an expression for displacement of the waveform, eta(x,y,t) , of a circular wave that is created when a stone is dropped into a pond. Simplest case, assuming an ideal fluid and neglecting non-linear effects.

Thanks,

/scepter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you are purely interested in cylindrical wave functions, Bessel, Hankel and Airy functions are all appropriate wave functions. I would think a Hankel function is most appropriate, a traveling cylindrical wave. As to the specific application of waves on the surface of a fluid, I am ignorant of the solution to that particular problem.
 
  • #3
The Hankel functions solves the Laplace equation for the velocity potential in cylindrical coordinates, so it describes a propagating circular wave.
How do I go about finding the expression for the surface displacement from the Hankel functions?
Is there no simpler way? I imagine the displacement must vanish at a rate proportional to 1/r, where r is the distance from the origin.
 
  • #4
scepter said:
The Hankel functions solves the Laplace equation for the velocity potential in cylindrical coordinates, so it describes a propagating circular wave.
How do I go about finding the expression for the surface displacement from the Hankel functions?
Is there no simpler way? I imagine the displacement must vanish at a rate proportional to 1/r, where r is the distance from the origin.
Actually it's the energy (density) that falls off at a rate proportional to 1/r, so the amplitude falls off at a rate proportional to [itex]1/ \sqrt{r}[/itex]. And that corresponds exactly to the asymptotic behaviour of the Bessel function (for large x).

[tex]J_m(x) \simeq \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi x}} \cos(x - \frac{m \pi}{4} - \frac{\pi}{4})[/tex]

Edit. Should be :

[tex]J_m(x) \simeq \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi x}} \cos(x - \frac{m \pi}{2} - \frac{\pi}{4})[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Ok, I see.
So to find the displacement at some distance away from the origin, which is what I`m interested in, I could use this asymptotic form of the Bessel function. Do I need to somehow convert it to polar coordinates?
I take it that there is no available simple expression for the displacement that contains the Bessel function? Maybe someone could outline the procedures for arriving at the displacement formula?
 
  • #6
Since Hankel functions are a combination of Bessel functions J and Y, with this case, there would be a singularity at r=0 for Y and thus the result should be a function of J. The only places I have sen Henkel functions arise is in situations where there is no interest in the r=0 case, i.e. annular ducts, incident flows or a pulsating source.

uart: You may want to check your equation for the asymptotic expansion of Jn. Your second cosine term should be [tex]\frac{m \pi}{2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #7
FredGarvin said:
Since Hankel functions are a combination of Bessel functions J and Y, with this case, there would be a singularity at r=0 for Y and thus the result should be a function of J. The only places I have sen Henkel functions arise is in situations where there is no interest in the r=0 case, i.e. annular ducts, incident flows or a pulsating source.

uart: You may want to check your equation for the asymptotic expansion of Jn. Your second cosine term should be [tex]\frac{m \pi}{2}[/tex]

In electromagnetics, the Bessel function is a standing wave and the Hankel function is a traveling wave. The wave equation that would arise with a line sourc such as the OP's would be a Hankel function unless he required a reflecting boundary.
 

FAQ: What Is the Expression for Circular Wave Displacement in a Pond?

1. What is the expression for a circular wave?

The expression for a circular wave is given by A sin(kr - ωt + φ), where A is the amplitude, k is the wave number, r is the distance from the center of the wave, ω is the angular frequency, t is time, and φ is the phase angle.

2. How do you calculate the wave number for a circular wave?

The wave number for a circular wave can be calculated using the equation k = 2π/λ, where λ is the wavelength of the wave.

3. What is the significance of the phase angle in the expression for a circular wave?

The phase angle represents the initial phase of the wave at t = 0. It determines the position of the wave on the x-axis and can affect the interference patterns of the wave.

4. Can the amplitude of a circular wave change over time?

Yes, the amplitude of a circular wave can change over time due to the phenomenon of wave superposition, where multiple waves can combine and interfere with each other, resulting in a change in amplitude.

5. How does the expression for a circular wave differ from that of a linear wave?

The expression for a circular wave is different from that of a linear wave because it takes into account the radial distance from the center of the wave, whereas a linear wave only considers the distance along the x-axis. Additionally, the angular frequency in the circular wave expression is dependent on the wave speed and wavelength, while the linear wave expression uses the wave speed and wave number.

Back
Top