I Expression for Uncertainty of Arbitrary Operator

DrPapper
Messages
48
Reaction score
9
Hello all, as far as I can see this question is not posted already, my apologies if it is and please provide a link. But I'm watching this video on youtube: And at 22:38 there's an expression given for the uncertainty of an arbitrary operator Q, however I'm concerned the expression is incorrect. Could anyone please look at the expression and tell me if it's true or a mistake?

The expression given is σ= < \hatℚ2 - <ℚ>2 >

Sorry, I can't seem to get LaTeX to work right, though I've managed it in the past.

If so could you please explain why it deviates from eqn 1.12 of Griffiths into QM which is:

σ=√(<j2>-<j>2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DrPapper said:
And at 22:38 there's an expression given for the uncertainty of an arbitrary operator Q, however I'm concerned the expression is incorrect. Could anyone please look at the expression and tell me if it's true or a mistake?

The expression given is σ= < \hatℚ2 - <ℚ>2 >
I actually I couldn't find that equation in the minute you mentioned above. Anyway, the difference between
DrPapper said:
σ= < \hatℚ2 - <ℚ>2 >
and
DrPapper said:
σ=√(<j2>-<j>2)
is just the presence of the square root. Had the square root been removed from the second equation, they will become equivalent because ##\langle C \rangle = C## if ##C## is just number while at the same time ##\langle Q \rangle^2## is also a number.
 
  • Like
Likes DrPapper
Let ##\bar A=\langle A\rangle##. Then ##\sigma_A^2:=\langle(A-\bar A)^2\rangle =\langle A^2\rangle -2\langle A\bar A\rangle+\langle\bar A^2\rangle =\langle A^2\rangle -2\bar A^2+\bar A^2 =\langle A^2\rangle -\bar A^2 =\langle A^2 -\bar A^2 \rangle##.

For the interpretation, see also this post and the discussion here.
 
  • Like
Likes DrPapper
A. Neumaier said:
Let ##\bar A=\langle A\rangle##. Then ##\sigma_A^2:=\langle(A-\bar A)^2\rangle =\langle A^2\rangle -2\langle A\bar A\rangle+\langle\bar A^2\rangle =\langle A^2\rangle -2\bar A^2+\bar A^2 =\langle A^2\rangle -\bar A^2 =\langle A^2 -\bar A^2 \rangle##.

For the interpretation, see also this post and the discussion here.
Thank you I'll check those out. :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top