Extinction Coefficient from Time series data

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the extinction coefficient (ε) for Br2 formation using time series absorbance data collected via UV-Vis spectroscopy. The reaction under study is BrO3- + 5Br- + 6H+ → 3Br2 + 3H2O, which is expected to go to completion. The participant initially plotted absorbance against time to find a linear slope but questioned the validity of this method. Suggestions included recording an additional calibration point and considering the use of a calibration curve with linear regression instead of relying solely on the extinction coefficient for kinetic measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of UV-Vis spectroscopy principles
  • Knowledge of the Beer-Lambert Law (A = εcl)
  • Familiarity with linear regression analysis
  • Basic concepts of chemical kinetics and stoichiometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Beer-Lambert Law and its applications in spectroscopy
  • Learn how to create and interpret calibration curves in UV-Vis spectroscopy
  • Study linear regression techniques for data analysis in kinetic studies
  • Explore methods for measuring reaction kinetics using time series data
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, analytical scientists, and researchers involved in kinetic studies and spectroscopic analysis, particularly those working with reaction mechanisms and absorbance measurements.

lee403
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
I have some time series data of the absorbance of Br2 formation using UV Vis spectroscopy and I need to figure out the extinction coefficient/ absorptivity.
The overall reaction is
BrO3-+5Br- +6H+-->3Br2+3H2O
which is expcted to go to completion
I know that the equation relating absorbance to concentration is
A=εcl
and I have times series A measurements and can calculate the initial concentrations of BrO3, Br -and the expected concentration of Br2 from the solutions I made. I just need to find ε.

I first attempted to plot the absorbance v. time and find the slope where it was most linear but I don't know how valid this approach is.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
lee403 said:
I first attempted to plot the absorbance v. time and find the slope where it was most linear but I don't know how valid this approach is.

It is about as good as it can be.

I would record an additional point after waiting for some time to make sure the amount of Br2 produced is just stoichiometric. That would give a good calibration point.

Besides, if all you are after is a time series (for kinetic measurements), all you are interested in is the rate of changes - are you sure you need absolute values for that?
 
Maybe I'm thinking about this wrong. I need to know the extinction coefficient for Br2 because in another reaction I measure its loss over time. So I dd an initial run for the formation of Br2 in order to determine its extinction coefficient. Then in a second run I added a compound that reacts with it and measured the absorbance again. I am interested in the rate of loss so does that mean the extinction coefficient from the initial run is not an exact value?
 
If you are using the same cuvette, wavelength and the same instrument you don't need extinction coefficient but a calibration curve. Linear regression on the data is typically a way to go.

What I don't get about your setup is why you use time series instead of just making a series of samples of different concentrations?
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K