Extra Dimesions (the Calabi-Yau shape)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yaaks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shape
Yaaks
Messages
39
Reaction score
2
Can anyone give me more insight on this Topic...
The mathematics of this geometrical shape is quite complex..,, its hard for me to imagine these shapes (infact i find it very difficult to imagine space wrap with the three spatial dimesions, its easier to imagine them with two dimesions).
and please brief me about Joyce mainfolds..

ThanX
 
Physics news on Phys.org
first, all tries to image the warps cause they are warped into the foruth dimension which we can't see are futile. Our brain is evolved to only be able to see 3 or imagen 3. Its simply not possicle. that's why scientist use 2d-3d when they imagen a extra dimension.
 
for your interest in this topic! The Calabi-Yau shape is a type of manifold, which is a mathematical concept that describes a space that is locally similar to Euclidean space. In simpler terms, it is a shape that can be described using a set of coordinates, much like how we use x, y, and z coordinates to describe points in 3-dimensional space.

The mathematics behind the Calabi-Yau shape is indeed complex and can be difficult to visualize. This shape is often used in string theory to explain the existence of extra dimensions beyond the three spatial dimensions we are familiar with.

Joyce manifolds are a type of Calabi-Yau shape that was discovered by mathematician Dominic Joyce in 1996. They are a specific type of Calabi-Yau shape that has properties that make them useful in certain areas of mathematics and theoretical physics. They are also often used in string theory and have been studied extensively by mathematicians and physicists.

Overall, the study of extra dimensions and Calabi-Yau shapes is a fascinating and ongoing area of research in mathematics and physics. It requires a deep understanding of advanced mathematical concepts and is constantly evolving as new discoveries are made. I hope this brief explanation helps to give you more insight into this topic.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
In LQG and LQC there are solutions called "black to white transition". I'll add some references: (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07251 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03872 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06330 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.04264 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12823 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02691 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.07589 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01788 https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12646 https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03027...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...
Back
Top